Looking back on this year, the most painful lesson was chasing high on small-cap MEME tokens. During that period, seeing the community's enthusiasm, I impulsively followed the trend and entered the market, only to get deeply trapped. Fortunately, I used position management tools to cut losses in time, avoiding a total wipeout.
Since then, I completely changed my approach. Now I only engage with projects backed by reputable platforms and with sufficient liquidity. Take Mubarak as an example: when it launched, I didn't rush in immediately. Instead, I first checked the 24-hour trading volume and the depth of the liquidity pool. Only after both indicators passed my review did I dare to try a small position. Honestly, this approach might cause me to miss out on explosive gains, but it helps avoid the hellish experience of "buying in but unable to sell."
My outlook for 2025 is very clear: market liquidity is contracting, and this is the main trend. In this environment, choosing projects supported by permanent platform liquidity becomes especially important. Why? Because it directly reduces slippage losses. Don't underestimate slippage—when a big market move occurs, a few points of slippage can determine whether you profit or lose.
Finally, I want to say: don’t treat trading like gambling. Stay calm, observe carefully, and compare various indicators. For small retail investors, this is more important than anything else.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxAddict
· 2h ago
The feeling of chasing high and getting trapped in small-cap MEME tokens is truly intense, it's a bloody lesson.
This guy is right, liquidity is the key, a few points of slippage can really change your fate.
I agree with this logic of testing the waters with small positions, but I still risk missing out on ten-bagger coins, boohoo.
Don't ask me why I still gamble, I just can't change this bad habit.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-06 18:52
Chasing MEME tokens higher is indeed a painful lesson. Watching those people in the group go crazy, I also went crazy, and the result... haha
Now I really only dare to watch liquidity and trading volume, rather miss out on ten times than get stuck and lose everything
Slippage can really kill you, especially when the market is volatile
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-06 18:52
The fate of chasing high MEME, I tasted the bitterness last year. But I gradually understood that liquidity is the key.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 01-06 18:48
You make a good point, but I still believe that this market rebound will directly surpass the 2025 high. Now is the time to buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 01-06 18:42
Chasing high and losing heavily on meme tokens has truly taught me a lesson. This liquidity review system is indeed reliable now.
---
What’s the slippage difference of a few points? That’s the dividing line between retail investors and gamblers.
---
I’m also watching Mubarak, but I haven’t acted yet. Let’s see if the trading volume stabilizes.
---
I agree with the 2025 liquidity contraction judgment. Those following the trend are all just newbies.
---
That’s right, don’t go all-in for real. I previously lost everything because I was greedy for a quick gain.
---
Projects with permanent liquidity support are indeed more reliable, no need to worry about getting stuck.
---
Staying calm and observing is truly more valuable than anything else, much better than those hype-driven information.
Looking back on this year, the most painful lesson was chasing high on small-cap MEME tokens. During that period, seeing the community's enthusiasm, I impulsively followed the trend and entered the market, only to get deeply trapped. Fortunately, I used position management tools to cut losses in time, avoiding a total wipeout.
Since then, I completely changed my approach. Now I only engage with projects backed by reputable platforms and with sufficient liquidity. Take Mubarak as an example: when it launched, I didn't rush in immediately. Instead, I first checked the 24-hour trading volume and the depth of the liquidity pool. Only after both indicators passed my review did I dare to try a small position. Honestly, this approach might cause me to miss out on explosive gains, but it helps avoid the hellish experience of "buying in but unable to sell."
My outlook for 2025 is very clear: market liquidity is contracting, and this is the main trend. In this environment, choosing projects supported by permanent platform liquidity becomes especially important. Why? Because it directly reduces slippage losses. Don't underestimate slippage—when a big market move occurs, a few points of slippage can determine whether you profit or lose.
Finally, I want to say: don’t treat trading like gambling. Stay calm, observe carefully, and compare various indicators. For small retail investors, this is more important than anything else.