There is a common pitfall in options trading: many people want to act as sellers to "collect rent," but end up continuously subsidizing the market.
Where does the problem lie? Most traders only look at the implied volatility (IV) relative to historical levels to make decisions, but that's not enough. True experts go further—by calculating the post-event volatility premium to determine whether options are truly cheap.
In other words, when you see IV at a high level and think an opportunity has arrived to sell, the market may have already priced in more aggressive volatility expectations. When major assets like $BTC, $ETH experience volatility beyond expectations, the pain begins for your account.
Therefore, in options trading, you should not only pay attention to the absolute level of implied volatility but also understand the logic behind volatility premiums—only then can you avoid the trap of seemingly stable returns that secretly hide huge risks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxOpener
· 01-06 23:57
Selling rent sounds profitable, but it ends up bankrupting oneself... I've seen too many people fall into this trap.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-06 23:56
Really, collecting rent as a seller sounds great, but in reality, it's just working for the market. I fell into this trap before too; when IV was high, I impulsively sold, and as a result, BTC suddenly gapped and exploded, which was really heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-06 23:47
This is a typical IV trap. Another bunch of people are about to get cut.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 01-06 23:42
Oh, this is my blood, sweat, and tears lesson. Selling rent sounds good, but in reality, you're being repeatedly harvested by the market.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-06 23:39
I was just wondering why I always rush to sell when IV is high, and it turns out I was wrong. It turns out I didn't fully account for the volatility premium.
There is a common pitfall in options trading: many people want to act as sellers to "collect rent," but end up continuously subsidizing the market.
Where does the problem lie? Most traders only look at the implied volatility (IV) relative to historical levels to make decisions, but that's not enough. True experts go further—by calculating the post-event volatility premium to determine whether options are truly cheap.
In other words, when you see IV at a high level and think an opportunity has arrived to sell, the market may have already priced in more aggressive volatility expectations. When major assets like $BTC, $ETH experience volatility beyond expectations, the pain begins for your account.
Therefore, in options trading, you should not only pay attention to the absolute level of implied volatility but also understand the logic behind volatility premiums—only then can you avoid the trap of seemingly stable returns that secretly hide huge risks.