2026-01-07 18:21:50

The Web3 storage track has recently welcomed another hardcore player. Walrus Protocol breaks many people's existing perceptions — it is neither a DeFi project nor focused on privacy, but instead concentrates on infrastructure for big data processing and storage.

What makes this solution interesting? It splits large files into intelligent segments, disperses storage across multiple nodes, and ensures data authenticity and continuity through encryption verification mechanisms. These three steps may seem simple, but they thoroughly avoid the single point risk and reliability issues of traditional storage solutions.

Whether it's a file rating system or TB-level data hosting, it can run very stably within this system. The credibility built on technological robustness is indeed a new option worth paying attention to in the Web3 storage track.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityNinja

· 01-10 15:10

Oh wow, Walrus really has some substance; it's not just another hype project based on a pump-and-dump concept...

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-10 11:31

Splitting + decentralization + verification, this combination is indeed powerful. However, whether a project can truly support TB-level custody depends on whether it can successfully run the economic model later on.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 01-08 11:46

Haha, this Walrus does sound a bit promising... but it still depends on whether it can really sustain itself in the future. --- Decentralized storage has actually been around for a while; the key is who can last the longest. --- Just the word "hardness" feels a bit superficial. I've heard this kind of claim many times in Web3. --- TB-level data hosting... can it really run stably? It always feels like something might go wrong. --- Not DeFi, and not focusing on privacy either. This positioning is quite fresh and worth paying attention to. --- I'm more interested in encryption verification. Compared to other solutions, how reliable is it?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainGossiper

· 01-07 20:08

The prospects look good, but can it stay stable? The biggest fear for this type of project is still the moment when the node crashes.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-07 18:50

You know, this Walrus is really a bit different. Instead of hyping concepts, it focuses directly on technology. Quite interesting. --- Splitting + decentralization + verification—basically, putting eggs in different baskets. The technical aspect is indeed solid. --- Wait, can TB-level hosting really run stably? I've heard that many major companies' storage solutions have also failed in the end... --- It feels like someone is finally taking Web3 storage seriously, unlike some projects that keep hyping the DeFi bubble every day. --- How is encryption verification being implemented? It always feels like there's a huge gap between theory and practice. --- Avoiding single points of failure is well explained, but what about ecosystem development? No matter how advanced the technology is, without an ecosystem, it's all pointless. --- This is exactly what I've been wanting to see—steadily building infrastructure, not messing around with flashy stuff. --- Honestly, compared to those projects that jump on trending topics every day, this kind of player definitely has a better outlook.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 01-07 18:45

ngl, the "sharding files into smart chunks" bit sounds solid on paper but... has anyone stress-tested this across actual network failures? learned the hard way that distributed storage always breaks in creative ways nobody predicted. not saying walrus is trash, just saying—protocol quirk alert, check your edge cases before going all-in 🚩

Reply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-07 18:41

Damn, Walrus's sharding logic is really impressive. Finally, someone is not taking the wrong path and focusing on infrastructure. The single point of failure issue has indeed been annoying with traditional solutions. The combination of distributed storage and encryption verification is really solid. Can it handle TB-level data stably? I need to see how it performs in real-world scenarios first; don't just trust the theoretical data. Another "disruptive" operation, let's wait and see. But the technical approach does have some real substance.

View OriginalReply0

Plastikkid

· 01-07 18:32

Hold tight 💪

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-07 18:31

No hype, no negativity. Walrus's approach of splitting + decentralization + verification indeed avoids many pitfalls, but can it really handle TB-level data stably? It depends on actual performance. --- Another new player. It seems the storage track has been quite hot recently, but no matter how strong the technical hype is, user experience is the key. --- The smart fragment decentralized storage system is indeed reliable, much better than single-point storage, but I wonder what the costs are. --- Finally, there's a project that isn't just hyping concepts. Building real infrastructure feels really satisfying. --- The encryption verification mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be perfect on paper, and a different story in actual practice. --- If TB-level hosting can run stably, that's definitely worth paying attention to, but the premise is to avoid failures. --- Good risk mitigation for single points. But how to solve the synchronization issues in distributed systems? It doesn't seem that simple. --- Interesting. Finally, I see a new idea that isn't DeFi or privacy-focused. Storage is indeed underestimated.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 01-07 18:31

Well... Walrus's split + decentralization + verification logic indeed has no major issues, but how many can truly run stably? The key still depends on node incentive design. Have the single point risk been mitigated? What about the economic model? This track is really competitive right now, but projects with enough robustness are definitely worth following.

View OriginalReply0