#MSCI未排除数字资产财库企业纳入范围 $BREV's recent market movement indeed taught the market a lesson.
The sharp drop to the 0.31 level, seemingly a simple sell-off, has a logical chain behind it worth dissecting. The starting point was that two leading market makers, Amber Group and GSR Markets, each received 1 million BREV tokens. According to the usual process, the next step should have been gradual market support and stabilization of volatility.
But the Brevis project team suddenly changed the script.
On-chain data shows that the team address transferred approximately $5.3 million worth of $BREV to exchanges in one go. No warning, no buildup—just a direct sell-off. The market instantly shifted from expectations of "market makers supporting the price" to "whales dumping," causing panic—how fast was this psychological shift? Buying interest immediately vanished, sell orders layered upon each other, and the price plummeted straight down. Even two top market makers were caught off guard.
Panic sentiment is more deadly than selling pressure itself. Many people at the time had only one thought: is this a run?
But the story didn't end there.
Good news was subsequently released, just in time for the market's most vulnerable moment. Capital started flowing back, and the price was forcibly pulled up, forming a deep V-shaped recovery—this candlestick was quite aggressive. Soon after, $BREV confirmed listing on a major exchange, liquidity sources were verified, and market makers remained active. This series of signals layered together shifted the entire logic from "possible collapse" to "supported."
The rebound thus began.
From the perspective of market participants, since there is exchange backing and two top market makers involved, a complete wipeout in the short term can indeed be ruled out. Of course, this doesn't mean volatility will calm down; new tokens are inherently volatile, but the risk of an "endless pit" has been significantly reduced based on on-chain data and trading ecology.
The most interesting part of this operation is that it disrupted all three dimensions of the market—chips, sentiment, and rhythm. The timing of the project team's dump, the reaction mechanism of market makers, and retail traders' psychological expectations—all were reshuffled. In the short term, 0.55 is a resistance level, while the long-term support level is around 1.2. But in this market, strategy is always more valuable than the market itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleMistaker
· 01-09 19:28
This move is really incredible. Dropped 5.3 million in one go and broke the defense directly.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 01-09 02:19
Just a $5.3 million investment, and it can even shatter people's hearts.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 01-08 09:39
Haha, this wave is indeed a textbook-level psychological battle.
This is the market; the chip surface is more honest than the K-line surface. Retail investors' panic is always the moment they are being harvested.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptain
· 01-07 19:30
The deep V-shaped cut was executed perfectly, even top-tier market makers couldn't react in time... This is the usual operation in the crypto circle; the project's "surprise" always comes faster than the good news.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-07 19:30
I am a grayscale arbitrageur, but I need to be frank — this wave is definitely a psychological battle, and dumping $5.3 million is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 01-07 19:26
Ha, I told you, this deep V pattern really has some substance.
Retail investors are scared silly by the sell-off, only to be pulled back again. It's truly amazing.
The key is still the information gap—whoever controls the rhythm wins.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 01-07 19:18
Nima, the project team's move this time is really awesome, directly dumping the market and crushing retail investors' confidence.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 01-07 19:14
$5.3 million directly invested, this tactic is brilliant—it's all about psychological warfare.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 01-07 19:13
Wow, this move is incredible. It directly crashes to the bottom and then pulls a deep V, a classic leek-cutting tactic.
#MSCI未排除数字资产财库企业纳入范围 $BREV's recent market movement indeed taught the market a lesson.
The sharp drop to the 0.31 level, seemingly a simple sell-off, has a logical chain behind it worth dissecting. The starting point was that two leading market makers, Amber Group and GSR Markets, each received 1 million BREV tokens. According to the usual process, the next step should have been gradual market support and stabilization of volatility.
But the Brevis project team suddenly changed the script.
On-chain data shows that the team address transferred approximately $5.3 million worth of $BREV to exchanges in one go. No warning, no buildup—just a direct sell-off. The market instantly shifted from expectations of "market makers supporting the price" to "whales dumping," causing panic—how fast was this psychological shift? Buying interest immediately vanished, sell orders layered upon each other, and the price plummeted straight down. Even two top market makers were caught off guard.
Panic sentiment is more deadly than selling pressure itself. Many people at the time had only one thought: is this a run?
But the story didn't end there.
Good news was subsequently released, just in time for the market's most vulnerable moment. Capital started flowing back, and the price was forcibly pulled up, forming a deep V-shaped recovery—this candlestick was quite aggressive. Soon after, $BREV confirmed listing on a major exchange, liquidity sources were verified, and market makers remained active. This series of signals layered together shifted the entire logic from "possible collapse" to "supported."
The rebound thus began.
From the perspective of market participants, since there is exchange backing and two top market makers involved, a complete wipeout in the short term can indeed be ruled out. Of course, this doesn't mean volatility will calm down; new tokens are inherently volatile, but the risk of an "endless pit" has been significantly reduced based on on-chain data and trading ecology.
The most interesting part of this operation is that it disrupted all three dimensions of the market—chips, sentiment, and rhythm. The timing of the project team's dump, the reaction mechanism of market makers, and retail traders' psychological expectations—all were reshuffled. In the short term, 0.55 is a resistance level, while the long-term support level is around 1.2. But in this market, strategy is always more valuable than the market itself.