Proposal bottlenecks are a common pain point for many DAO communities. Submitting → discussion → voting → execution, each step involves waiting, and the final decision often takes more than a week to implement. Token holders want to contribute but are discouraged by the cumbersome process, leading to idle funds and a sharp decline in community engagement.
The recent governance upgrade by Lista DAO offers a new solution to this problem. They integrated on-chain voting with smart fund pool scheduling, reducing the average time from proposal submission to execution from 7 days to 48 hours. The proposal you submit over the weekend can have funds moved on Monday, and project results can be seen — something unimaginable in traditional DAOs.
Technically, they use multi-signature wallets combined with on-chain governance scripts for automation. Every fund operation requires smart validation, reducing the risk of manual intervention while ensuring full transparency across the entire process. They plan to launch cross-chain governance next quarter, which could improve asset scheduling efficiency by another 30%-40%, truly enabling funds to flow freely on the chain.
On the community side, there are real monetary incentives. The reward pool already holds over 500,000 USDC. Participants in voting or proposal submission can earn rewards, distributed based on token holdings and activity levels. This directly boosts participation and encourages long-term token holding.
From an ecosystem perspective, Lista DAO emphasizes modular design, allowing governance and fund scheduling to be combined flexibly. This approach offers valuable insights in DAO exploration.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 19h ago
48 hours sounds great, but once the multi-signature automation script bugs out, the risk of cascading liquidations skyrockets... Is the 500,000 USDC reward pool really enough to share?
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 01-08 18:37
Cut from 7 days to 48 hours? I have to try this efficiency; it's much faster than the DAO groups I've been with before.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-07 23:16
7 days into 48 hours, this is the rhythm a DAO should have
---
Really, I've been fed up with the traditional DAO processes for a long time
---
A reward pool of 500,000 USDC? Now token holders should start to take action
---
Multi-signature + automation scripts seem to be the right approach to solve DAO inefficiency
---
Proposing on the weekend and executing on Monday—other DAOs wouldn't even dare to imagine this
---
Cross-chain governance with an additional 30% efficiency? If it's achievable, I would buy in immediately
---
Basically, replacing manual processes with smart contracts to save trouble
---
Incentive mechanisms combined with rapid execution—this combo is pretty good
---
Finally, there's a DAO seriously working to solve the long-standing problem of proposal backlog
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-07 19:46
Cut from 7 days to 48 hours? That's pretty intense. Finally, a DAO dares to tackle this pain point.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-07 19:37
Another useless innovation, but this time it really reduced the time from 7 days to 48 hours. It should be feasible in theory.
---
Multi-signature + automation scripts, Luban No.7 is under construction again. I'll try out this smart pit first.
---
50,000 USDC sitting in the reward pool? Now I understand the true essence of DAO participation.
---
Cross-chain governance will have to wait another quarter, but thinking about it, it's quite interesting. This contract has some potential.
---
Funding bottlenecks have been improved, but I'm more curious about how much gas fee this system can trap people into.
---
Modular governance sounds fancy, but its practical value... MAX looking forward to it.
---
Proposals over the weekend executed on Monday? The academic value is definitely high, just depends on whether the team can truly freeze it with one click.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-07 19:30
Can it be executed in just 48 hours? This is what a DAO should look like. Otherwise, waiting for weekly resolutions is really frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-07 19:28
Cut from 7 days to 48 hours? Now that's the way a DAO should be. Stop wasting time with so many procedures.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-07 19:22
48-hour implementation? This is what a DAO should look like, don't make it seem like a traditional company.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-07 19:22
From 7 days to 48 hours, the efficiency is truly amazing. However, the incentive pool of 500,000 USDC is really attractive.
Proposal bottlenecks are a common pain point for many DAO communities. Submitting → discussion → voting → execution, each step involves waiting, and the final decision often takes more than a week to implement. Token holders want to contribute but are discouraged by the cumbersome process, leading to idle funds and a sharp decline in community engagement.
The recent governance upgrade by Lista DAO offers a new solution to this problem. They integrated on-chain voting with smart fund pool scheduling, reducing the average time from proposal submission to execution from 7 days to 48 hours. The proposal you submit over the weekend can have funds moved on Monday, and project results can be seen — something unimaginable in traditional DAOs.
Technically, they use multi-signature wallets combined with on-chain governance scripts for automation. Every fund operation requires smart validation, reducing the risk of manual intervention while ensuring full transparency across the entire process. They plan to launch cross-chain governance next quarter, which could improve asset scheduling efficiency by another 30%-40%, truly enabling funds to flow freely on the chain.
On the community side, there are real monetary incentives. The reward pool already holds over 500,000 USDC. Participants in voting or proposal submission can earn rewards, distributed based on token holdings and activity levels. This directly boosts participation and encourages long-term token holding.
From an ecosystem perspective, Lista DAO emphasizes modular design, allowing governance and fund scheduling to be combined flexibly. This approach offers valuable insights in DAO exploration.