Recently, I saw news about Walrus securing $140 million in funding and its valuation soaring to $2 billion. I don't think this is just luck; rather, its tokenomics design truly resonates with people. This is also the key reason why I have always been optimistic about it.
First, let's talk about the distribution strategy. WAL tokens allocate only 7% to investors, but community airdrops account for 10%—which means tokens worth about $200 million are directly airdropped to users. This "more airdrops than funding allocation" model is really rare in the entire storage sector. Projects that can do this show that respect for the community is genuine, not just lip service.
Second, the deflationary logic. Every transaction on the Walrus network destroys a portion of WAL. As more applications emerge in the ecosystem and trading activity increases, the token supply continuously decreases. This self-consuming model is more convincing than those with unlimited inflation, and in the long run, it can truly support the price.
Third, don't overlook the backing institutions. Top funds like a16z, Standard Crypto, and Electric Capital are all involved, mostly veteran players in the Sui ecosystem. What does this tangled relationship mean? It means these institutions will continue to push Walrus's development, providing resources, channels, and ecosystem support without shortage.
Honestly, for those seeking long-term growth points, WAL's economic model offers both short-term liquidity support (airdrops and exchange listings) and long-term deflationary logic backed by institutional support. In the storage sector, it's truly a rare good project.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
nft_widow
· 3h ago
Airdrops account for a larger proportion than financing? That move is indeed aggressive, but to be honest, how many people can actually get an airdrop?
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 19h ago
Wait, a 10% airdrop directly thrown out? That's a really bold move. It's much more reliable than those projects that prioritize community hype with empty talk every day.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-09 21:05
I've always said that the storage track will be the next hot spot. Now it looks like WAL's approach really hit the mark. Opportunity knocks only once.
A 10% airdrop compared to 7% financing—this is the rhythm of investing real money into the community. The trend is clear.
Deflation logic + backing from top-tier funds—that's the real wealth secret. It's really not just luck.
Honestly, I was studying this logic three years ago. Now I finally see it coming to fruition.
Don't wait. It's not too late to get in now, but you must understand its economic model thoroughly. This wave of correction is the best opportunity to get on board.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 01-07 19:42
10% Airdrop vs 7% Funding Allocation, this move is indeed aggressive and more considerate than most projects.
Deflationary model + institutional endorsement, I think this combination has some potential.
I'm just worried that if the ecosystem cools down later and trading volume can't keep up, the deflationary logic will be the real test.
The folks at a16z entering the scene is basically a reassurance, but it still depends on whether Sui can really take off.
I've long seen Walrus's ambitions; the token distribution design shows that they genuinely want to build an ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-07 19:32
Watching Walrus data again at 3 a.m... 7% investor share vs 10% community airdrop, that gap really stings. With a $200 million airdrop size, the current question is how long can the liquidity depth sustain?
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 01-07 19:28
⚠️ hold up, lemme audit this tokenomics real quick... 7% to investors but 10% airdrop? that's either genius or classic honeypot setup i've seen 47 times before, not financial advice but DYOR on those burn mechanics first
Reply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 01-07 19:27
Airdrop share ratio is straightforwardly higher than the fundraising ratio. This tactic is indeed ruthless and truly invests in the community.
Recently, I saw news about Walrus securing $140 million in funding and its valuation soaring to $2 billion. I don't think this is just luck; rather, its tokenomics design truly resonates with people. This is also the key reason why I have always been optimistic about it.
First, let's talk about the distribution strategy. WAL tokens allocate only 7% to investors, but community airdrops account for 10%—which means tokens worth about $200 million are directly airdropped to users. This "more airdrops than funding allocation" model is really rare in the entire storage sector. Projects that can do this show that respect for the community is genuine, not just lip service.
Second, the deflationary logic. Every transaction on the Walrus network destroys a portion of WAL. As more applications emerge in the ecosystem and trading activity increases, the token supply continuously decreases. This self-consuming model is more convincing than those with unlimited inflation, and in the long run, it can truly support the price.
Third, don't overlook the backing institutions. Top funds like a16z, Standard Crypto, and Electric Capital are all involved, mostly veteran players in the Sui ecosystem. What does this tangled relationship mean? It means these institutions will continue to push Walrus's development, providing resources, channels, and ecosystem support without shortage.
Honestly, for those seeking long-term growth points, WAL's economic model offers both short-term liquidity support (airdrops and exchange listings) and long-term deflationary logic backed by institutional support. In the storage sector, it's truly a rare good project.