Stop arguing about which LLM is smarter—there's a deeper problem nobody's talking about.
Most AI systems today operate like black boxes. You get an answer, cross your fingers, and hope it's accurate. But what if you could cryptographically verify that an AI's output was computed correctly, without revealing the underlying model?
That's where zero-knowledge proofs enter the picture. The technology enables verifiable computation—you can prove an AI result was actually computed as claimed, creating a layer of transparency and accountability. No more blind trust. Instead, you get mathematical proof.
This shift could reshape how we think about AI reliability. From trusting the vendor to verifying the computation itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
On-ChainDiver
· 22h ago
Zero-knowledge proof is indeed absolute, but how many projects are actually using it... Having only mathematical proof is not enough; the TPS issue also needs to be addressed.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-07 21:59
This ZKP move is indeed brilliant. Instead of bragging about which model is smarter, this is the real thing to pay attention to.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 01-07 21:50
The zk proof area is indeed interesting, but how many projects can truly be implemented to verify AI outputs? Frankly, the ideals are quite lofty.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-07 21:47
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really be used in AI verification, or is it just another hyped-up concept?
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-07 21:38
Zero-knowledge proofs really need to be thoroughly understood; compared to just increasing parameter sizes, it's much more meaningful.
Stop arguing about which LLM is smarter—there's a deeper problem nobody's talking about.
Most AI systems today operate like black boxes. You get an answer, cross your fingers, and hope it's accurate. But what if you could cryptographically verify that an AI's output was computed correctly, without revealing the underlying model?
That's where zero-knowledge proofs enter the picture. The technology enables verifiable computation—you can prove an AI result was actually computed as claimed, creating a layer of transparency and accountability. No more blind trust. Instead, you get mathematical proof.
This shift could reshape how we think about AI reliability. From trusting the vendor to verifying the computation itself.