2026-01-07 22:22:58

FET/USDT 4-hour level observation

The AI sector remains hot, and capital attention to this area is still quite active.

Although there has been some adjustment following the overall market, from a technical perspective, this looks more like a healthy pullback. As long as the correction is in place, it is expected that there will be more sufficient buying interest to enter, continuing the previous upward momentum. The entire logical chain remains intact, and bullish signals are still worth paying attention to.

FET1,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForumMiningMaster

· 12h ago

A pullback is a signal to buy, FET still has a chance in this wave

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 12h ago

A proper pullback is a signal to buy, and this wave of FET cannot be missed.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 01-09 20:32

A pullback is a buying opportunity. This wave of FET is definitely a good one.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 01-07 22:53

tbh, your pullback analysis conveniently ignores the actual vol profile distribution. classic confirmation bias.

Reply0

MetaverseHobo

· 01-07 22:52

A pullback is a buying opportunity; this wave of FET is quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking

· 01-07 22:52

Retracements are good opportunities to get on board, as long as AI doesn't die, the bulls won't rest.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 01-07 22:49

A pullback is a buying opportunity; this wave of FET won't let me down.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-07 22:35

It should be pointed out that your conclusion of "healthy pullback" is overly naive. On-chain data shows that whale addresses of FET have net outflows within 48 hours, which is far from the buying signal you mentioned. It is recommended to re-evaluate your technical model.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim