Here's what really changed the game: passive money.
Index funds and ETFs now represent roughly 52% of US long-term fund assets—that's over $19 trillion in play. Think about that scale for a moment.
Had regulators blocked digital asset treasury companies from this space, they'd effectively lock themselves out of more than half the entire US investable market. Billions in capital flows would've faced barriers. The math doesn't work for institutional players considering such restrictions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryBaby
· 01-10 16:32
52% are passive funds... No wonder institutions have to come in; it's unstoppable.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 01-10 06:24
52%? As soon as this number comes out, regulators have to bow and scrape, it's unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 01-07 22:54
52%? That's a frightening number. Passive investing has already dominated half of the market.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-07 22:51
ngl, these numbers are scary... 19 trillion just flowed into passive funds. If regulators really lock down crypto assets, that would be a truly suicidal decision.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 01-07 22:46
52% of passive index funds have been absorbed, which is why institutions are so eager to get into digital assets.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 01-07 22:46
$19 trillion, regulation has turned around and knelt. This is what it means when the market speaks, and the retail investors shut up.
Here's what really changed the game: passive money.
Index funds and ETFs now represent roughly 52% of US long-term fund assets—that's over $19 trillion in play. Think about that scale for a moment.
Had regulators blocked digital asset treasury companies from this space, they'd effectively lock themselves out of more than half the entire US investable market. Billions in capital flows would've faced barriers. The math doesn't work for institutional players considering such restrictions.