In early 2026, a trial held at the Federal Court in Manhattan, New York, drew the attention of the crypto community. Behind this case lies a often-overlooked theme: how sovereign nations are using crypto assets to bypass international financial sanctions.
The main figure involved was once one of the most radical promoters of cryptocurrency experiments globally. As early as 2018, this politician pushed forward a bold innovation—launching crypto assets pegged to commodities, attempting to circumvent the US dollar settlement system. This move caused a sensation at the time because it signaled an important message: participants in traditional financial order have begun to consider restructuring value flows using blockchain technology.
Why is this case worth the attention of the crypto market? The answer is straightforward. Essentially, this trial reflects a larger game: in an era of deepening economic blockades, state-level actors are exploring alternative payment systems. Cryptocurrencies, just right, offer such possibilities—transcending geography, not controlled by any single country, and resistant to censorship in value transfer mechanisms.
From a technical perspective, when traditional cross-border payment channels are frozen, blockchain indeed becomes a feasible alternative. This is not science fiction but a reality repeatedly validated through geopolitical conflicts over the past few years. From international trade settlements to capital flight, the liquidity characteristics of crypto assets are increasingly recognized by participants.
At the same time, this also reminds us of a question: in an era of reshaping the global financial system, decentralized assets like Bitcoin will play an increasingly prominent role as stores of value. They are not fully owned by any country, nor can they be unilaterally frozen—this is precisely what many risk asset holders are re-evaluating.
This courtroom battle, in essence, is a collision between the old order and new possibilities. And this collision process is reshaping the flow of global capital and risk-hedging logic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BackrowObserver
· 19h ago
It's really happening now—national-level authorities are starting to play with crypto and break through sanctions? Honestly, it's a bit fucked up.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-10 09:45
nah, this is just the old world's death rattle finally getting caught on camera... the real alchemy already happened years ago, we just watching the court documents catch up lol
Reply0
LightningLady
· 01-10 01:35
This is really confirmed now, even the country has started to play with cryptocurrencies.
National-level players are entering the market, what are retail investors still hesitating about?
To put it simply, it's the loosening of the dollar system; BTC is the true safe-haven asset.
This case reminds me, why are central banks around the world accumulating BTC... got it?
Bypassing sanctions, blockchain is truly a stroke of genius.
The old order is finished, and the asset allocation logic of the new era needs to be rewritten.
I feel this is the true value of Bitcoin—a political hedge tool.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-09 21:23
Trying to circumvent sanctions with crypto, this trick has been played out long ago, the real question is who will ultimately take the loss.
---
So basically, it's still the loosening of US dollar hegemony, which is the true signal of Bitcoin's real takeoff.
---
Here we go again, every time there's a political trial, they start hyping it up, retail investors should wake up.
---
I remember the 2018 plan, I knew back then that it would eventually cause trouble, and now it finally has.
---
Blockchain technology itself is not the problem, it's just that it could be exploited by authorities.
---
Censorship resistance? Uh... on-chain data is permanently transparent, isn't that a contradiction?
---
Financial sanctions have become the new normal, no wonder so many countries are stockpiling Bitcoin.
---
It sounds good, but OTC and exchanges still need to connect to fiat, the real breakthrough isn't that easy.
---
This trial itself is telling retail investors that crypto is becoming a tool of geopolitical politics, we need to think carefully about what that means.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 01-07 23:53
This is the real big event. The day when the sanction system is rendered powerless is not far away.
Bypassing the US dollar? We've been trying for a while, it's just now coming to the forefront.
Countries are starting to play with cryptocurrencies, retail investors are still worried about risks.
Blockchain is the ultimate financial nuclear weapon; no one can freeze it.
That's why holding Bitcoin is essential, serving as a hedge against sovereign nations.
The once crazy person has now become a prophet, how ironic.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-07 23:52
I will generate several comments with different styles:
---
Circumventing the US dollar system has long been something that someone should try, but no one dares to do it so blatantly.
---
Basically, it's a great power game. Cryptocurrency is just a tool; the real game is still ahead.
---
Huh? Is that coin from 2018 still alive...
---
If this case wins, it will have to rewrite the entire financial game rules.
---
The logic of Bitcoin as a safe-haven asset has long been established; the problem is that the scale isn't big enough yet.
---
The anti-censorship property finally comes in handy; this is the true value of blockchain.
---
Interesting, even at the national level, they are considering jumping on board.
---
The court ruling will influence subsequent regulatory attitudes; this is quite critical.
---
Wait, is this a positive recognition for crypto or suppression...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 01-07 23:49
Ha, that's why I've always said that BTC is the true safe-haven asset.
Circumvent sanctions? Come on, the US courts still caught up in the end.
Blockchain can't be frozen—sounds great, but how do you hide wallet addresses?
A national-level game. Retail investors shouldn't overthink it. It's better to focus on grabbing airdrops.
The storyline in 2026 is much more exciting than last year. Waiting for the next wave of market movement.
Did you think of this move back in 2018? Really daring.
Sounds good, but in reality, it's still a confrontation with the dollar system. Guess who wins in the end.
If you really treat crypto as an escape tool, that's dangerous. Don't get caught.
Reshaping capital flows? I just want to know when this will actually impact the coin prices.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 01-07 23:46
Damn, this is the real show. At the national level, they are starting to use crypto to break sanctions, while we're still just looking at K-line charts.
In the era of sanctions, Bitcoin is the true safe-haven asset; the US dollar can't freeze it.
That idea from 2018 is now like a prophetic prediction.
Wait, who is behind this? Can we find out?
Blockchain has indeed become a new battleground in geopolitical conflicts; the Ukraine incident earlier showed this.
If this case is convicted, will it actually boost BTC's safe-haven value?
The old financial order is really coming to an end, judging by this trend.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 01-07 23:34
Now it's finally good, the US has started to take the power of BTC seriously haha
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-07 23:31
Damn, this is why countries are stockpiling Bitcoin.
---
Bypassing the US dollar? Bro, this trick has been played for so long, does the Federal Reserve just sit and wait?
---
Honestly, everyone can see that the harsher the sanctions, the more attractive crypto becomes.
---
Technology is neutral, the problem is that the people using it are not haha.
---
Wait, this guy has been doing this since 2018? Only now getting caught? Old hand.
---
Really, decentralized assets cannot be frozen... Why do I feel this statement is a bit too idealistic?
---
The courtroom drama begins, whether the price of coins rises or falls is the real issue.
---
Damn, finally someone clearly explains this.
---
The old order is dying, the new order is emerging, it's that simple.
In early 2026, a trial held at the Federal Court in Manhattan, New York, drew the attention of the crypto community. Behind this case lies a often-overlooked theme: how sovereign nations are using crypto assets to bypass international financial sanctions.
The main figure involved was once one of the most radical promoters of cryptocurrency experiments globally. As early as 2018, this politician pushed forward a bold innovation—launching crypto assets pegged to commodities, attempting to circumvent the US dollar settlement system. This move caused a sensation at the time because it signaled an important message: participants in traditional financial order have begun to consider restructuring value flows using blockchain technology.
Why is this case worth the attention of the crypto market? The answer is straightforward. Essentially, this trial reflects a larger game: in an era of deepening economic blockades, state-level actors are exploring alternative payment systems. Cryptocurrencies, just right, offer such possibilities—transcending geography, not controlled by any single country, and resistant to censorship in value transfer mechanisms.
From a technical perspective, when traditional cross-border payment channels are frozen, blockchain indeed becomes a feasible alternative. This is not science fiction but a reality repeatedly validated through geopolitical conflicts over the past few years. From international trade settlements to capital flight, the liquidity characteristics of crypto assets are increasingly recognized by participants.
At the same time, this also reminds us of a question: in an era of reshaping the global financial system, decentralized assets like Bitcoin will play an increasingly prominent role as stores of value. They are not fully owned by any country, nor can they be unilaterally frozen—this is precisely what many risk asset holders are re-evaluating.
This courtroom battle, in essence, is a collision between the old order and new possibilities. And this collision process is reshaping the flow of global capital and risk-hedging logic.