2026-01-07 23:27:43

A $10M funding commitment is now backing the project's growth trajectory. Rather than rushing through the process, capital is flowing in steadily to accelerate the round progression. What sets this apart: there's no artificial pressure or manufactured urgency—just consistent backing moving things forward at a natural pace.

The public participation tier has officially launched. This marks the final stage for community members looking to get involved. Whether you're timing your entry or monitoring the project's momentum, the window is live right now.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinSkeptic

· 1h ago

Ten yuan worth of rice is progressing steadily. I like this pace; there's no sense of urgency to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-08 21:40

Prudent financing, no unnecessary fluff, this is the right way.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-07 23:57

Funding at a steady and unhurried pace—that's the rhythm I truly appreciate.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-07 23:56

ah, $10M flowing in "naturally" without urgency... *checks notes* pretty sure i've seen this exact script before. 2017 called, wants its "organic growth narrative" back. the pattern recognition is almost too easy at this point.

Reply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 01-07 23:53

I've seen this steady financing trick before, but only when 10 million in real cash actually lands does it count.

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 01-07 23:30

$10M steady? lol that's cute, back in my mining days we'd call that a Tuesday. but ngl the "no artificial urgency" angle actually hits different—tired of projects manufacturing FOMO like it's their job. real question tho: what's the actual TPS bottleneck on this thing? can it handle scaling or are we looking at another gas fee nightmare situation?

Reply0