American oil majors are raising the stakes on Venezuela exposure. They're not stepping into that market without ironclad government protection—guarantees that shield them from political volatility and contract disputes. Financial Times reports the industry is essentially drawing a line: commitment depends on Washington backing their plays. It's a classic risk-mitigation move, but it signals how geopolitical friction shapes where capital flows. When institutional players demand state-level insurance before deploying capital, energy markets tighten and alternative assets start looking more attractive to portfolio managers watching global instability.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBuildervip
· 12h ago
Basically, those guys on Wall Street don't want to lose money. They only dare to move on Venezuela's oil fields if the government backs them up. This move shifts the capital risk onto taxpayers—brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
MevTearsvip
· 15h ago
Basically, Big Oil is afraid to take the risk and only willing to invest in Venezuela if the U.S. government guarantees it. That logic is a bit crazy...
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971vip
· 01-09 09:19
Basically, the big oil giants need government backing to dare to touch Venezuela. When geopolitical tensions flare up, capital just runs away. That's the real market logic.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHuntervip
· 01-08 04:55
Oh my, now even major American oil companies need government guarantees to dare to engage with Venezuela. How scared are they... Speaking of which, this just proves why traditional capital is so timid in the face of political risk, while we who are pushing on the chain seem a bit braver (or maybe a bit crazy haha). Wait, when the energy market tightens, alternative assets become popular... Do you think this hints at something? I'm starting to feel like going all-in on certain things...
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 01-08 04:55
Laughing out loud, now American big shots need government endorsement before they dare to touch Venezuela? Literally translated, it just means they're cowardly.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 01-08 04:54
Isn't this just shifting the risk onto the country, a typical sovereign credit backing play? Once U.S. policy shifts, the entire guarantee system collapses instantly—vulnerabilities and attack vectors are so obvious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 01-08 04:42
In plain terms, big capital doesn't want to take the risk anymore; they only dare to act on Venezuela's matter if Uncle Sam gives a guarantee.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegretvip
· 01-08 04:29
What the hell is reality... U.S. oil companies only dare to touch Venezuela if the government endorses them. This is what you call the cowardly logic of big capital.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)