2026-01-09 08:22:38

Recently, there's an interesting trend circulating: X, the social platform, is changing its incentive rules to reward truly active users.

In simple terms, it's no longer just about whether your single post can go viral, but about your long-term performance on the platform. Screen time, interaction frequency, and whether you can stimulate community discussion are now the new standards. In other words, instead of relying on a lucky viral hit to sustain yourself, it's more worthwhile to consistently produce content and interact with fans every day.

This shift is quite fascinating. For creators, it means that traffic is no longer solely dependent on luck; more emphasis is placed on genuine effort. An account that maintains steady output is actually more attractive than one that occasionally jumps on trending topics. Over time, this can attract more professional creators and community-based accounts to produce quality content, which in turn boosts the platform's overall activity and naturally increases user engagement.

However, some also point out potential issues: if too much emphasis is placed on screen time, it could be exploited, leading to more spam, flooding, and ineffective content. How the platform balances content quality and activity in the future will be the real test.

From a broader perspective, this adjustment reflects an industry trend: shifting from pure traffic competition to valuing community and user contributions. For the Web3 community, this shift in mindset might offer some inspiration—what kind of ecosystem can survive longer, and what kind of operations truly retain people's hearts.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

4am_degen

· 7h ago

Really, compared to a viral hit, it's still about daily accumulation. Wait, this metric of dwell time... we need to watch out for spamming users. This logic works even better in Web3, but the key is that someone genuinely needs to produce content sincerely.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 8h ago

Well... it's easy to say, but really implementing it is too difficult. Now we're going to start competing again, I feel like... But on the other hand, relying on just increasing watch time will eventually get you eliminated. Wait, how do we define "genuine interaction"? Consistently producing quality content is important, but who can stick with it? Let's see how the platform handles spam accounts; otherwise, it'll all be just fake accounts. This logic doesn't work in Web3 either; it's still the same old tricks.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 15h ago

Changing rules again, this time it's really interesting Persistence in output is the key, small retail investors finally have a chance However, for this set of logic to truly take hold, we need to guard against spam bots messing around Balancing activity and quality is the real challenge Web3 needs to learn, don't just focus on concepts, you must truly retain people

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-10 08:58

tbh if you look at the data on engagement metrics, this is just repackaged time-on-app farming dressed up as "community value"... degens will absolutely game this with bot spam and we all know it, right? sustainable returns require actual quality control, not just screen time optimization lol

Reply0

SleepyValidator

· 01-09 08:51

Really? Does the duration also count? What about those bot spammers?

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 01-09 08:47

You're trying to harvest the little guys again, sounds nice but it's just to make people flood the chat.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 01-09 08:47

Now it's really time to get serious and stop relying on just a single tweet to relax. After implementing this stay duration system, the screen-spamming crowd is probably doomed haha. Wait, isn't this rule also easy to manipulate with fake views? It depends on how X's anti-cheat measures respond. Finally, no more obsessing over hot topics and viral hits; the era of genuinely creating content has arrived. How to balance quality and activity, these two rivals... feels like people will still find loopholes. Can the Web3 ecosystem learn from this approach? Seems unlikely. Consistent output is the best, but if I really had to post every day, I might go crazy. Is this logic basically turning the platform from a "traffic factory" into a "community operation"? Kinda interesting. Stay duration can be easily faked; platforms need to be vigilant. From competing for traffic to competing for contributions, this shift is pretty rapid.

View OriginalReply0

token_therapist

· 01-09 08:44

Taking the time to create quality content is indeed more reliable than jumping on trending topics... I'm just worried that in the end it will turn into a game of how long you can last. The spamming crowd is going to be happy now; they really think that posting more water can make money. Long-termism sounds good, but the question is how long X can stick to it. Interesting... If Web3 can truly learn this, that would be great. Right now, it's still a bunch of zero-sum games. The design of the stay duration metric is a bit risky; it's easy to be manipulated. What sounds like encouragement is actually just an attempt to retain more activity... a little scheme by the platform. Consistent output definitely broadens the track, but how newcomers can break through remains a problem. The real test is how to block those mindless spammers, or else it will just turn into an arms race.

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-09 08:25

Hey, once again judging value based on screen time... feels like this logic is prone to problems. Genuine talented creators don't need to rely on boosting their presence; finding the right balance is the key. This actually signals that for the ecosystem to last long, it must rely on real contributions rather than inflated data. Damn, the race between sincere output and sheep-herding is about to start again. But on the other hand, this approach does provide some insights for Web3, much healthier than the pure traffic era. The question is... how can platforms distinguish between truly active users and fake ones? That’s where the technology really tests. Instead of changing the rules, it’s better to design mechanisms that are harder to deceive, honestly. If it can truly distribute rewards based on contribution rather than popularity, that would be progress. I’m just waiting to see if this will once again turn into a new wave of content farms...

View OriginalReply0