A common challenge faced by Web3 developers: managing user identity data is complex and risky. Especially when building their own KYC systems, it not only delays development progress but also distracts the team, causing those who should focus on product innovation to get stuck in compliance quagmires. Is there a way to shed this burden? The solution is actually straightforward—separate identity verification from the core development and delegate it to professionals. Through identity abstraction and modular design, development teams can focus their efforts on refining core features while ensuring user data flows within a trusted framework. This approach reduces technical burdens and mitigates risk exposure. For Web3 projects aiming to operate lightly, such identity solutions are becoming increasingly critical.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaOnTheRun
· 16h ago
This issue should have been resolved long ago, otherwise Web3 developers would be stuck reinventing the wheel every day.
Outsourcing KYC is indeed a clever move, saving yourself from a mess.
That said, are these professional identity solutions reliable now? Can the risks really be avoided?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 21h ago
This round of identity solutions truly addresses the pain points of Web3. I've always said that specialization and division of labor are the future, and now someone has finally systematically organized this.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 01-11 09:09
outsourcing this identity management is basically being lazy, but it is indeed a wise kind of laziness
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 01-09 08:56
Really, KYC is a thankless task. How come there are still people starting from scratch...
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-09 08:51
Haha, bro, I've thought of this move a long time ago. Building KYC in-house is really exhausting and not worth it.
Outsourcing identity verification to a professional team definitely saves trouble, but how to handle trust issues?
It's really a matter of division of labor—let the people who should focus on it focus, and don't try to do everything yourself.
Web3 projects really need this kind of lightweight solution; otherwise, there's no way to allocate energy for innovation.
Forget it, better to find a reliable third party to avoid compliance pitfalls later on.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 01-09 08:40
Ha, finally someone said it. The KYC system is really a big pitfall.
To be honest, outsourcing identity verification is a wise move; doing it yourself just invites trouble.
Agreed, professional tasks should be handled by professional teams. Don't try to do everything yourself.
This idea is good; modularization can indeed free up productivity, allowing the team to focus solely on product development.
Don't mess around with compliance yourself; the risks are too high and the returns are particularly low.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 01-09 08:40
Haha, I already said that doing KYC yourself is just asking for trouble. Professional matters should be handled by professionals.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 01-09 08:37
Haha, finally someone said it. I've seen how many projects die on this line before.
A common challenge faced by Web3 developers: managing user identity data is complex and risky. Especially when building their own KYC systems, it not only delays development progress but also distracts the team, causing those who should focus on product innovation to get stuck in compliance quagmires. Is there a way to shed this burden? The solution is actually straightforward—separate identity verification from the core development and delegate it to professionals. Through identity abstraction and modular design, development teams can focus their efforts on refining core features while ensuring user data flows within a trusted framework. This approach reduces technical burdens and mitigates risk exposure. For Web3 projects aiming to operate lightly, such identity solutions are becoming increasingly critical.