BTC and ETH market trends always reveal two extremes—some people get liquidated to the point of having to mortgage their house, while others’ accounts maintain a steady upward curve. When I first entered the market in early 2024 with $2,000, I’ve now kept a record of zero liquidations for over a year. The experiences of my colleagues and my own journey form a stark contrast.
What’s the difference? It’s not about prediction ability, nor insider information. Simply put, it’s treating trading as a game of probabilities, using systematic methods to manage every bit of risk.
**The First Key: The Logic of Locking in Profits**
The moment you open a position, take-profit and stop-loss orders should be placed simultaneously. When the account’s floating profit reaches 10% of the principal, immediately take half of the profit and transfer it to a cold wallet. The remaining half continues to operate. This approach seems simple, but the results are quite interesting—if the market continues to rise, the remaining position benefits from compound interest; if the market suddenly reverses, it’s just giving back some profits, and the principal remains safe.
Over five years, I’ve used this logic to withdraw 37 times, with the largest single withdrawal reaching 180,000 USDT in one week. The exchange even called for a video verification, mistaking it for suspicious activity. This isn’t about frequent trading, but about making profits flow out in an orderly manner under controlled risk conditions.
**The Second Key: Multi-Timeframe Dislocation Strategy**
For the same coin, it’s necessary to observe across three timeframes—use the daily chart to determine the main trend, the 4-hour chart to identify specific zones, and the 15-minute chart for actual entry points. Based on this, open two positions for the same coin: one following breakout signals to go long, with a stop-loss set at the previous low on the daily chart; the other using limit orders to ambush in the overbought zone on the 4-hour chart.
The stop-loss for both positions is no more than 1.5% of the principal, but the take-profit target is set at over 5 times. Most of the market time is spent oscillating, probing in both directions. Others might get liquidated due to unidirectional holding, but this hedging approach allows profits on both sides.
**The Third Key: Treat Stop-Loss as a Cost**
Many people misunderstand stop-loss, thinking losses mean failure. But from another perspective, a 1.5% stop-loss is like buying a lottery ticket—spending this cost for a chance at a big reward. When a stop-loss is triggered, it’s actually a moment to reassess the market and look for the next opportunity.
Once in profit, let the take-profit move with the gains, giving the profits room to run. But if the market suddenly turns, exit immediately. Mastering this rhythm is far more important than any candlestick technique.
The entire system’s logic is quite simple: it doesn’t rely on precise predictions of the future, but on layered risk isolation and probability management, turning market volatility into a source of profit rather than a threat. Since early 2024, my account curve has not experienced more than 8% drawdown—not luck, but the repeated validation of this methodology.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothing
· 22h ago
It sounds like there are many tricks, but there seem to be few who can truly stick to execution.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-09 08:58
Wow, just hearing about 37 withdrawals already has me on edge, this rhythm is really 🐮
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 01-09 08:55
This methodology sounds good, but the key is execution. Most people know they should take profits and cut losses, but they just can't do it.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-09 08:39
Well said, it's a matter of execution. Most people know what to do but can't follow through.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-09 08:36
According to on-chain data, the core logic of this risk control system is indeed worth in-depth analysis—1.5% stop loss + 5x take profit ratio setting. From a probability theory perspective, even a success rate of only 20% can achieve a positive expected value, which is far below the market average.
It is worth noting that the 37 withdrawal records and 8% maximum drawdown mentioned in the article, if evaluated using traditional financial risk management frameworks (such as the Sharpe ratio), already outperform 90% of actively managed funds... But the key question here is—Is the sample size large enough to be statistically significant? How strong is the validation of starting with 2000U during market transitions between bull and bear phases?
The specific analysis is as follows: multi-cycle dislocation positioning can indeed profit from both sides in a sideways market, but when the market experiences a one-sided crash or surge (not uncommon in history), the gamma risk of this hedging strategy is often severely underestimated. It is recommended to supplement historical backtest data for extreme market scenarios.
Additionally—thinking about it—withdrawals from cold wallets are essentially a form of psychological take profit. From a behavioral finance perspective, this can effectively avoid the "roller coaster" mentality... This point is indeed very solid.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 01-09 08:34
Honestly, I have to admit I find this logic a bit convincing, especially the operation of cutting half the profit at 10%. It sounds greedy but is actually the most stable.
BTC and ETH market trends always reveal two extremes—some people get liquidated to the point of having to mortgage their house, while others’ accounts maintain a steady upward curve. When I first entered the market in early 2024 with $2,000, I’ve now kept a record of zero liquidations for over a year. The experiences of my colleagues and my own journey form a stark contrast.
What’s the difference? It’s not about prediction ability, nor insider information. Simply put, it’s treating trading as a game of probabilities, using systematic methods to manage every bit of risk.
**The First Key: The Logic of Locking in Profits**
The moment you open a position, take-profit and stop-loss orders should be placed simultaneously. When the account’s floating profit reaches 10% of the principal, immediately take half of the profit and transfer it to a cold wallet. The remaining half continues to operate. This approach seems simple, but the results are quite interesting—if the market continues to rise, the remaining position benefits from compound interest; if the market suddenly reverses, it’s just giving back some profits, and the principal remains safe.
Over five years, I’ve used this logic to withdraw 37 times, with the largest single withdrawal reaching 180,000 USDT in one week. The exchange even called for a video verification, mistaking it for suspicious activity. This isn’t about frequent trading, but about making profits flow out in an orderly manner under controlled risk conditions.
**The Second Key: Multi-Timeframe Dislocation Strategy**
For the same coin, it’s necessary to observe across three timeframes—use the daily chart to determine the main trend, the 4-hour chart to identify specific zones, and the 15-minute chart for actual entry points. Based on this, open two positions for the same coin: one following breakout signals to go long, with a stop-loss set at the previous low on the daily chart; the other using limit orders to ambush in the overbought zone on the 4-hour chart.
The stop-loss for both positions is no more than 1.5% of the principal, but the take-profit target is set at over 5 times. Most of the market time is spent oscillating, probing in both directions. Others might get liquidated due to unidirectional holding, but this hedging approach allows profits on both sides.
**The Third Key: Treat Stop-Loss as a Cost**
Many people misunderstand stop-loss, thinking losses mean failure. But from another perspective, a 1.5% stop-loss is like buying a lottery ticket—spending this cost for a chance at a big reward. When a stop-loss is triggered, it’s actually a moment to reassess the market and look for the next opportunity.
Once in profit, let the take-profit move with the gains, giving the profits room to run. But if the market suddenly turns, exit immediately. Mastering this rhythm is far more important than any candlestick technique.
The entire system’s logic is quite simple: it doesn’t rely on precise predictions of the future, but on layered risk isolation and probability management, turning market volatility into a source of profit rather than a threat. Since early 2024, my account curve has not experienced more than 8% drawdown—not luck, but the repeated validation of this methodology.