Let's calculate based on the most concrete application of commercial spaceflight—low Earth orbit satellites.



In theory, China, the US, and Canada together could launch 100,000 satellites (this number is actually close to the physical limit). The manufacturing cost of a single SpaceX satellite is about $3.5 million. Domestic manufacturers' costs are slightly higher, possibly reaching tens of millions per satellite, but this is the trend, and there is still room for cost reduction. Let's estimate with a cost of $3.5 million per satellite, which totals $350 billion for 100,000 satellites.

Adding the rocket launch system and ground infrastructure, the entire market scale is roughly capped at a trillion US dollars.

The problem is—compared to the trillion-dollar new energy sector or the ten-trillion-dollar level of AI and embodied intelligence, this scale is simply not in the same league. The gap is too large.

Of course, if we include those sci-fi applications Elon Musk talks about, like lunar landings and Mars trips, perhaps a bigger story can be told. But those are still too far away to count.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 13
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretfulvip
· 6m ago
Is this the ceiling of satellite internet? It sounds like it's not even a fraction of the new energy sector.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 1h ago
The satellite doesn't look as big as I imagined. Is it really just this size...
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluffvip
· 01-10 09:58
No matter how many satellites there are, it's just this much, not as impressive as AI.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreetsvip
· 01-09 09:51
Hundred-billion-dollar ceiling? Isn't that just the bubble burst by the market? If you keep calculating like this, commercial spaceflight is just an imagination game.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 01-09 09:48
The satellite dish isn't as big as it seems; it feels like it's been hyped up to be worth more than its actual value.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 01-09 09:47
The hundred-billion-level market compared to the trillion-level is indeed a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 01-09 09:47
Ah, well, basically the ceiling of this track is too low; compared to AI, it's not even a fraction.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMomvip
· 01-09 09:37
When you do the math, commercial spaceflight isn't as big as I imagined. I might make more money trading cryptocurrencies.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-09 09:36
Well, to be honest, commercial spaceflight is just a hype track that has been overhyped. When you lay out the numbers, that's really how it is. It sounds impressive, but in reality, the billion-dollar ceiling is just a little brother compared to AI. Elon Musk's pie-in-the-sky promises are pretty slick, but the Mars dream will probably take several decades. Right now, it's just low Earth orbit satellites holding up the facade, and the costs haven't even come down yet—it's even more expensive domestically. If this story weren't wrapped in a space dream narrative, no one would be speculating on it anymore. It's really just capital valuing things far into the future; the actual money to be made right now isn't that much. Instead of focusing on commercial spaceflight, it's better to look at AI and new energy for faster profits.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-09 09:35
Wait, I recalculated this 350 billion... No, wait, why does this number seem so "coincidental"? Are the whales manipulating the market again?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)