2026-01-09 09:29:47

Recently, a decentralized AI network project $DN has gained popularity, which makes me a bit conflicted.

First, let's talk about the positive aspects. The project is indeed backed by funding support, the foundation account has been set up, and the trading platform has provided verification badges. These basic endorsements are somewhat reassuring. Regarding token distribution, an airdrop quota has been reserved for the community. Although the specific allocation details are not yet clear, at least the community has participation opportunities. Currently, community tasks are quite simple, mainly involving account binding and similar operations, so the entry barrier is low. From a chip perspective, the early circulation might not be large, which does give some room for market control.

But there are also obvious issues. The official Twitter account was only created a little over half a year ago (created in November), so its history is short. Even more concerning is that the actual application product is still labeled "coming soon," meaning users haven't actually been able to try it out yet. Plus, the overall transparency of the project isn't great, with many details somewhat vague, which naturally causes some unease.

Ultimately, this is a typical "look long, act short" project. As long as you don't blindly believe, you won't get caught holding the bag.

DN-8,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-12 09:02

Ah, this is just a trick. A new Twitter account in half a year, and still talking about decentralization... The product hasn't even launched yet, just selling air here. Wake up, everyone. Low-threshold tasks + low liquidity, a classic leek-cutting combo. I won't touch it; it's too虚 (虚 means "虚" in Chinese, which can imply "虚" as in "虚幻" or "虚空," but here it likely means "虚" as in "虚假" or "虚拟," implying it's too虚虚的 or虚假的).

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 01-09 22:34

Twitter dares to boast about AI networks in just over half a year? The product isn't even visible yet --- Airdrop tasks just require linking an account, I know this trick too well --- Large market manipulation space + poor transparency, definitely a prelude to cutting the leeks --- Looking at the long term but acting short? Nice words, just gambling on whether it can run faster --- Backed by funding + certification badge, the packaging looks quite convincing --- Projects without real products are just storytelling; once the story is told, it's over --- Early circulation is low = manipulators can heavily dump, better to forget it --- Wait and see, anyway there are many such projects, no rush --- Blind faith is the real gamble; clear-headed people are just waiting to cut someone

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 01-09 09:59

Twitter dares to boast about air in just half a year, and the product is still "coming soon." Isn't this just classic storytelling to fleece investors?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-09 09:57

It's the same old trick. The Twitter account was only created six months ago, and they're already trying to siphon funds. The product isn't even out yet, and they're already pushing airdrops. I just want to ask, what are these people thinking? --- Low-threshold tasks, market control, and funding endorsements—after a set of combined tactics, isn't this just the standard "scalp and cut the韭" script? --- The transparency is really top-notch; the details are so blurry that it's almost non-existent. Honestly, it's just because they're afraid of being exposed. --- Wait, this project hasn't even launched a product yet and they're already hyping it up. Am I the only one who thinks this is a bit rushed? --- Funding endorsements sound impressive, but without real data to support them, I’ll just keep observing. --- Early circulation with low volume does indeed have potential, but it depends on who’s playing. Are the main players just cutting you, or are they playing along with you? --- The most disgusting part is the community airdrop without a clear plan. When the time comes, how the distribution is handled will all be up to them.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 01-09 09:56

It's the same old hype about air projects, daring to boast about the AI revolution on Twitter after just half a year... Wake up, everyone. If I had known the product was still just a shadow, I wouldn't have hesitated. Lack of transparency and still daring to raise funds—I've seen this trick a hundred times.

View OriginalReply0