2026-01-09 09:34:03

Recently checked out a few decent small-cap coins and couldn't help but make a comparison.

AST project was quite popular in the market some time ago, and this emerging star definitely has potential. However, when it comes to truly grabbing attention, it’s all about HYPE. Although this project team isn’t large, the backing funds are definitely substantial — I’ve heard big investors are involved. A small team able to achieve this scale, whether the founders are making good profits or not, at least shows they have guts.

Looking at LIT, they’ve secured a pretty large funding amount and are constantly bragging. Compared to that, while the funding scale is there, the team’s execution ability and actual output seem a bit lacking.

Overall, small teams that can achieve results really need a combination of luck and strength. HYPE, despite having fewer people, is more efficient; whereas LIT has more funding but a lot of noise with little real impact — this is a common pitfall for many projects. When evaluating projects, it’s important to focus on actual output rather than just funding numbers.

HYPE1,66%

LIT-9,5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerGas

· 01-12 03:58

Laughing out loud, it's another project with high funding and low output. I've seen this kind of LIT pattern too many times. I agree that HYPE is small but refined; I just don't know how long it can last. Instead of focusing on funding numbers, it's better to look at real user retention—that's the true key.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-11 20:50

HYPE, this small but excellent team, is actually more reliable. No matter how beautifully the fundraising story of LIT is told, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

ProxyCollector

· 01-11 14:55

A small team making big moves can really pack a punch; the LIT strategy is too old school.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeAssassin

· 01-09 10:02

Raising more funds isn't necessarily a good thing. LIT's situation is really quite typical. I agree with the small but refined vibe of HYPE. Ultimately, a project still depends on the substance; it's not about who raises more funds, but about the quality of the content.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-09 09:59

ngl capital utilization is the real tell here... small team high velocity > bloated rounds with nothing to show lol

Reply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 01-09 09:57

A small team actually gets things done, this is what an expert looks like --- LIT just looks good in fundraising numbers, but the output is disappointing --- HYPE this round is indeed top-notch, fewer people but efficiency is explosive --- Another big investor turns into an air project, haha --- So it still depends on what has been done, don’t just listen to the hype --- Big investors are deploying in HYPE, I just follow and copy --- LIT has a huge momentum, but I didn’t see it coming --- That’s why I only look at execution ability, not the amount of fundraising

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 01-09 09:54

Having fewer people and higher efficiency really isn't a problem; LIT has indeed been overhyped.

View OriginalReply0

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 01-09 09:52

The HYPE small team is more efficient than the LIT bunch in fundraising, this is the true essence of playing with coins. --- What’s the use of LIT bragging about fundraising numbers every day? Output is the real king. --- Small teams are bold, and indeed easy to produce dark horses, but beware of flipping over. --- Having more funding ≠ being able to get things done. LIT is a textbook negative example. --- I like this kind of approach like HYPE, no nonsense, just get to work. --- There are too many projects with loud voices but little rain, LIT’s recent situation is a bit awkward. --- To put it simply, it still depends on the team’s execution ability; having a lot of money is useless. --- Big investors are all lurking around HYPE; this signal is worth paying attention to. --- LIT is a typical example of beautiful fundraising data but poor performance. --- Small and refined vs large and scattered, this contrast is too heartbreaking.

View OriginalReply0