One major exchange challenged the narrative around stablecoins. Their policy chief recently presented research indicating that stablecoins aren't a significant driver of traditional bank deposit outflows—contrary to some regulatory concerns. He also referenced the emerging interest-bearing features in China's digital yuan as a broader market signal. This kind of data-backed pushback from established platforms adds nuance to the stablecoin debate, showing how central bank digital currencies are evolving their own competitive features.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullTherapist
· 01-11 14:21
Hi, data speaks for itself. Regulatory panic often stems from misunderstanding, and the blame for stablecoins shouldn't be so easily assigned.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-09 10:52
The data speaks for itself and indeed slapped a lot of regulatory panic in the face, but are stablecoins really that harmless... It still seems to depend on the specific scenario.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 01-09 10:47
Alright, alright, you're back to throwing data around saying stablecoins aren't that bad? Why wouldn't I believe it? The regulators and those folks must have their reasons, right?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 01-09 10:41
Damn, is this wave of data from the exchange calling out the regulatory authorities? Stablecoins aren't actually draining funds that aggressively—does this logic hold up?
Digital Yuan is also starting to generate yields; is the central bank challenging the stablecoins... But speaking of which, is this research reliable? We need to look at the sample size.
Regulators have been worrying blindly; the real threat might have already changed form. What do you all think?
This rebuttal is quite interesting; finally, a major platform is willing to bravely tell the truth.
Once the central bank's CBDC gets involved, things will be different; stablecoins' days might really be changing.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 01-09 10:39
Whether stablecoins are good or bad depends on the data, and the research this exchange has presented this time is actually quite interesting... However, whether regulators believe it or not is another story lol
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 01-09 10:26
Are stablecoins really not the result of banks' outflows? Data speaks louder than regulation, isn't that more interesting?
One major exchange challenged the narrative around stablecoins. Their policy chief recently presented research indicating that stablecoins aren't a significant driver of traditional bank deposit outflows—contrary to some regulatory concerns. He also referenced the emerging interest-bearing features in China's digital yuan as a broader market signal. This kind of data-backed pushback from established platforms adds nuance to the stablecoin debate, showing how central bank digital currencies are evolving their own competitive features.