American legislation is approaching a turning point. The debate centers on who should be authorized to distribute yields on stablecoin holdings – a decision with consequences for millions of users and the profitability of major platforms.
The conflict between the financial sector and the crypto industry
The traditional banking sector argues strongly that only regulated financial institutions should be allowed to offer such services. The reasoning is obvious: crypto platforms could divert savings from the traditional banking system. On the other hand, the crypto industry warns of the consequences of this regulation. It fears that strict restrictions would not only suppress competition but also threaten the revenue streams of digital asset managers.
Coinbase intensifies its political activity
Amid this controversy, Coinbase is significantly expanding its presence among US decision-makers. The company is doing everything it can to preserve its existing business model – the compensation of stablecoin holders. At the same time, Coinbase signals flexibility with limits: as long as transparency requirements are involved, the platform might make concessions. However, if the upcoming legislation on cryptoasset market structure imposes stricter restrictions beyond mere disclosure obligations, the company threatens to reconsider its current support.
What’s at stake
The stablecoin yield is much more than a marginal earning opportunity – it shapes the business model of entire platforms. As Senate debates progress, the answer to this central question will influence the future of the crypto industry in the US.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Stablecoin Yields in Focus: How the US Senate is Redefining Business Models in the Crypto Industry
American legislation is approaching a turning point. The debate centers on who should be authorized to distribute yields on stablecoin holdings – a decision with consequences for millions of users and the profitability of major platforms.
The conflict between the financial sector and the crypto industry
The traditional banking sector argues strongly that only regulated financial institutions should be allowed to offer such services. The reasoning is obvious: crypto platforms could divert savings from the traditional banking system. On the other hand, the crypto industry warns of the consequences of this regulation. It fears that strict restrictions would not only suppress competition but also threaten the revenue streams of digital asset managers.
Coinbase intensifies its political activity
Amid this controversy, Coinbase is significantly expanding its presence among US decision-makers. The company is doing everything it can to preserve its existing business model – the compensation of stablecoin holders. At the same time, Coinbase signals flexibility with limits: as long as transparency requirements are involved, the platform might make concessions. However, if the upcoming legislation on cryptoasset market structure imposes stricter restrictions beyond mere disclosure obligations, the company threatens to reconsider its current support.
What’s at stake
The stablecoin yield is much more than a marginal earning opportunity – it shapes the business model of entire platforms. As Senate debates progress, the answer to this central question will influence the future of the crypto industry in the US.