2026-01-14 10:21:16

PALU's experience is truly heartbreaking. Looking back at the four major meme coins of the same period—Binance Life, Giggle, Number 4, and PALU—the first three either entered contract trading or launched on the spot market, only PALU was neglected.

What’s even more painful is the background contrast. PALU was born from the organizational chart of a major exchange and was once designated as the eighth person by the official. Over the past two years, from the editor to the community, hundreds of tweets and countless peripheral creative efforts laid the groundwork, and there should have been a story. But what is the reality? Bibi suddenly intervened, and MO was relentlessly chasing—when these new mascots started to compete with PALU, who still cared about the current state of this outcast?

This is not just a matter of token price but a microcosm of ecological tilt. The same IP operation logic, but different fates. It’s painful, really painful.

GIGGLE4,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rugpull_ptsd

· 8h ago

This is the crypto world—new loves make us forget old flames. Being abandoned by PALU is truly heartbreaking; the IP operation strategy should have been updated long ago. Two years of groundwork, and this is it? Why is no one stepping in to take over? Why can bibi and MO turn things around, while PALU ends up as a background prop? The ecological tilt is really about the influence of capital. No matter how carefully you operate, it can't compare to a hot hype cycle.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 8h ago

The biggest regret is not getting on the train earlier, bibi. Now looking at PALU, it's really a bit awkward.

View OriginalReply0

ContractFreelancer

· 8h ago

Really, the PALU incident feels like the official team stabbed themselves in the back. The ecosystem bias is so obvious; all the early groundwork was in vain. The new mascot is adopting the same approach as PALU, but PALU is being ignored, which is ironic. Using the same operational tactics, others take off while you fall behind—this difference in treatment is truly stark.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 8h ago

In simple terms, even the officially supported IPs have to look at whether the funds are on their side. No matter how good the storytelling is, it can't change the ecological tilt. Two years of groundwork have vanished into thin air, which is the usual way of cutting in the crypto world. The official series keeps launching new ones, who still remembers the last one that fell out of favor? This operation is all too familiar. It doesn't seem to be a PALU issue; it's that the ecosystem team simply didn't include it in their future plans, treating it as a backup from the very beginning. The rise of bibi and MO shows that official resources are indeed tilted. The eight-character setting of PALU has long been compromised, and there's no point in hyping it now.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 8h ago

Ah, in just two years of groundwork, we were completely blocked by Bibi and MO. That's incredible.

View OriginalReply0