When researching privacy public chains, I accidentally discovered a quite interesting phenomenon. In the past, when everyone mentioned privacy coins, they thought of those completely anonymous old projects that regulators keep their distance from. But now, this track has become quite differentiated—some new projects are trying to do something that seems contradictory: ensuring privacy protection while complying with regulatory requirements. Dusk is the most aggressive in this game.
Why is it considered aggressive? Because it focuses on the areas most important to traditional finance—the on-chain issuance and trading of regulated assets. This is not just a slogan; they have actually obtained licenses for the European MTF multi-party trading facility, brokerage licenses, and crowdfunding service provider licenses. In plain language, this means they can legally issue securities on-chain, operate asset trading, and handle crowdfunding financing. This is indeed rare in the crypto space. Most projects avoid KYC altogether, and actively applying for financial licenses is even more uncommon.
From a technical perspective, Dusk has built a three-layer modular stack. The bottom layer, DuskDS, handles consensus, data availability, and settlement, using an improved proof of stake mechanism called Succinct Attestation. The middle layer is DuskEVM, an execution layer developed based on the OP Stack, fully compatible with EVM, capable of running Solidity contracts directly, with block generation speed controlled at 2 seconds. The top layer, DuskVM, is a WASM virtual machine optimized for zero-knowledge proof applications, designed specifically for privacy computing.
This architecture reflects a trend: the competition among next-generation public chains may no longer be solely about performance or ecosystem size, but about who can smarter balance privacy and transparency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinHunter
· 37m ago
Hey, wait a minute, privacy coins can still be played like this? Did they really get a European license? If that's true, then it's a bit of a big deal...
The path of compliant privacy is indeed uncharted territory; it feels like it could either explode or multiply a hundredfold, with no middle ground.
The three-layer architecture sounds very powerful, but I'm worried it's just talk and won't be implemented, possibly delaying the launch by another six months.
A privacy solution that is friendly to regulation? That's about to overturn the entire narrative. I'll keep an eye on it.
They’re hyping it up quite a bit, but let's talk again when they actually get on board. For now, let's just observe.
If this gets off the ground, the potential for traditional finance to connect to the chain... Never mind, I’ll wait for a pullback before discussing further.
Regulation + privacy = the next hot spot or a false proposition? Let's see how it unfolds this year.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12h ago
Damn, Dusk's move is indeed brilliant. It's rare to see privacy chains actively embracing regulation.
---
Getting an MTF license? This is really going to shake things up. Is traditional finance coming in?
---
Can privacy and compliance coexist? Honestly, it's a bit uncertain, but this idea is definitely innovative.
---
A three-layer stack sounds fancy, and 2-second block times are quite interesting.
---
Wait, are they moving asset securitization onto the chain? That would be a real disruption.
---
Where's the promised decentralization? Now it's about who is most compliant. Haha, how ironic.
---
Is this thing reliable? Let's keep watching and see.
---
Zero-knowledge proofs combined with EVM compatibility, the architecture design is quite impressive.
---
Privacy coins are finally becoming mainstream. Who will be the next to follow suit?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 12h ago
Damn, Dusk is really about to revolutionize privacy coins...
---
Focusing on privacy while maintaining compliance, this balancing act is truly brilliant.
---
A privacy chain with a European license? Now that's real ambition.
---
The three-layer stack sounds good, but I wonder how it performs in practice.
---
Honestly, compared to those who boast about ecosystems every day, Dusk's approach is even more aggressive.
---
Wait, zero-knowledge proofs + EVM compatibility, this is indeed a new idea.
---
As expected, the future is privacy + compliance; the era of avoiding regulation is over.
---
This phrase "rare as phoenix feathers and unicorn horns" is used perfectly. Few projects in the crypto space dare to do this.
---
2 seconds block time, how about the cost?
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 12h ago
This is the real gameplay: privacy + compliance are not really contradictory.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 12h ago
This is the right path. Finally, a project has figured it out.
Dusk's licensing is excellent; compliant privacy is no longer a false proposition.
Wait, can this three-layer stack really be implemented?
Getting a license is easy, but maintenance is difficult. How will it be played later?
Can privacy and regulation coexist? I remain skeptical.
This wave has indeed reached new heights; traditional finance used to look down on crypto, but now the situation has reversed.
To put it nicely, it's about balance; to be blunt, neither side can be fully satisfied.
That's not right. EVM compatibility can achieve privacy? It depends on how the execution layer is designed.
If Dusk survives until the next cycle, it's considered a win.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 13h ago
This is the real way out—privacy + compliance combined.
Dusk has truly penetrated the core of traditional finance with this move; projects that dare to proactively obtain licenses are indeed rare.
By the way, this three-layer stack has quite a high technical complexity. Can it really run smoothly?
Privacy and transparency are not inherently opposed; it seems some projects have figured that out.
Wait, do European licenses get accepted in other regions? That’s the key, isn’t it?
When researching privacy public chains, I accidentally discovered a quite interesting phenomenon. In the past, when everyone mentioned privacy coins, they thought of those completely anonymous old projects that regulators keep their distance from. But now, this track has become quite differentiated—some new projects are trying to do something that seems contradictory: ensuring privacy protection while complying with regulatory requirements. Dusk is the most aggressive in this game.
Why is it considered aggressive? Because it focuses on the areas most important to traditional finance—the on-chain issuance and trading of regulated assets. This is not just a slogan; they have actually obtained licenses for the European MTF multi-party trading facility, brokerage licenses, and crowdfunding service provider licenses. In plain language, this means they can legally issue securities on-chain, operate asset trading, and handle crowdfunding financing. This is indeed rare in the crypto space. Most projects avoid KYC altogether, and actively applying for financial licenses is even more uncommon.
From a technical perspective, Dusk has built a three-layer modular stack. The bottom layer, DuskDS, handles consensus, data availability, and settlement, using an improved proof of stake mechanism called Succinct Attestation. The middle layer is DuskEVM, an execution layer developed based on the OP Stack, fully compatible with EVM, capable of running Solidity contracts directly, with block generation speed controlled at 2 seconds. The top layer, DuskVM, is a WASM virtual machine optimized for zero-knowledge proof applications, designed specifically for privacy computing.
This architecture reflects a trend: the competition among next-generation public chains may no longer be solely about performance or ecosystem size, but about who can smarter balance privacy and transparency.