2026-01-14 10:23:46

Here's the thing - there's a critical difference between these two tokens. One is routing fees directly to the Opus dev, while the other sends them to an Opus agent instead. The original implementation? That's the legitimate approach. The fee structure matters more than people realize when evaluating which version actually represents the authentic project.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 8h ago

Xiongxiong just did some calculations, and the cost flow directly to developers vs. transferred to agents—this difference can really draw out a statistically significant curve... The original version is truly authentic, data speaks(◍•ᴗ•◍)

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 8h ago

Well, basically it's the difference between direct dev delivery and going through an agent. These two are very different, and the genuine one really pays attention to detail.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 8h ago

Laughing to death, it's the same old trick—whoever pays the fee is the "beloved son," and the other becomes the wild child. This show in the crypto world is more dramatic than my xiangsheng twists.

View OriginalReply0