Most public blockchains are competing in speed and popularity, but Adichain is focusing on another aspect—national-level coordination capabilities.
This is not just a simple performance optimization, but an implementation of programmable compliance at the protocol level, supporting sovereign chains with local rules, while enabling value transfer between different chains through cross-network settlement. This design logic is the key to attracting government agencies and institutional users. When the scale of funds reaches this level, speed itself becomes a secondary concern; what is truly needed is infrastructure that can be accommodated within regulatory frameworks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeJumper
· 7h ago
This approach is quite interesting; finally, someone is not just thinking about stacking TPS. Compliance is indeed the real threshold for institutional entry; it's not something that performance metrics can solve.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 7h ago
ngl this compliance layer angle hits different... most chains are chasing tps like it matters, but adichain's actually playing 4d chess with regulatory arbitrage. sovereign chain infrastructure that doesn't get nuked by governments? that's the real alpha nobody's talking about.
Reply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 7h ago
Awake again, another public chain that wants to "embrace regulation." I'm tired of hearing this talk.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 8h ago
Honestly, this idea is a bit extreme. Others are competing in TPS, while we're focusing on compliance... But can this really be implemented? It feels like the imagination is greater than the reality.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 8h ago
Hey, that's not right. If the government really needs to use it, they'd have to build their own chain. Why would they use a public chain?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 8h ago
Hey, finally someone understands. Others are still comparing TPS, but this guy is directly targeting compliance... The government falls for this trick.
Most public blockchains are competing in speed and popularity, but Adichain is focusing on another aspect—national-level coordination capabilities.
This is not just a simple performance optimization, but an implementation of programmable compliance at the protocol level, supporting sovereign chains with local rules, while enabling value transfer between different chains through cross-network settlement. This design logic is the key to attracting government agencies and institutional users. When the scale of funds reaches this level, speed itself becomes a secondary concern; what is truly needed is infrastructure that can be accommodated within regulatory frameworks.