If giants enter the scene to create a CEX or DEX, it could indeed become the next Web2 to Web3 growth miracle. However, to be honest, some new types of DEXs are also innovating in their own ways.
Take MPM (Matching Pool Mechanism) as an example, which divides the perpetual contract matching process into three layers. The first layer is P2P matching—longs and shorts are directly paired automatically, which helps to clear a large number of orders. What about the remaining unmatched orders? They move to the second layer, where an AMM mechanism and liquidity providers continue to match. The third layer involves an automatic hedging logic that acts as a safety net. Looking at it this way, DEX product design is indeed becoming more advanced with each generation.
However, some projects' tokens are underperforming. Many tokens have already fallen to their floor prices, market enthusiasm is basically gone, and the VC token label cannot be shed, making the outlook quite bleak. No matter how strong the new mechanism is, if the token ecosystem can't keep up, it's all for nothing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 9h ago
Speaking of this MPM's three-layer logic, it sounds good, but ultimately it's just the same old trick. No matter how fancy the mechanism design or tokens are, they can't save it.
The coin price has been steadfast, and any innovation is in vain.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApe
· 11h ago
No matter how fancy the mechanism, it can't save a broken coin; it's still the same old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 11h ago
Three-layer matching sounds good, but how many can actually survive? The overall market still depends on fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 11h ago
Hey, no matter how fancy the mechanism is, it all depends on whether the token can pump the price. Right now, these VC tokens are basically scythe tokens.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 12h ago
No matter how fancy the mechanism is, it can't save VC coins. The floor price has already collapsed, so what's there to talk about?
If giants enter the scene to create a CEX or DEX, it could indeed become the next Web2 to Web3 growth miracle. However, to be honest, some new types of DEXs are also innovating in their own ways.
Take MPM (Matching Pool Mechanism) as an example, which divides the perpetual contract matching process into three layers. The first layer is P2P matching—longs and shorts are directly paired automatically, which helps to clear a large number of orders. What about the remaining unmatched orders? They move to the second layer, where an AMM mechanism and liquidity providers continue to match. The third layer involves an automatic hedging logic that acts as a safety net. Looking at it this way, DEX product design is indeed becoming more advanced with each generation.
However, some projects' tokens are underperforming. Many tokens have already fallen to their floor prices, market enthusiasm is basically gone, and the VC token label cannot be shed, making the outlook quite bleak. No matter how strong the new mechanism is, if the token ecosystem can't keep up, it's all for nothing.