The convergence of deepfakes, AI avatars, and synthetic voice technology has made identity verification unexpectedly urgent. Worldcoin's core proposition around proof of humanity suddenly feels less abstract and more practically necessary—when you can't trust what you see or hear anymore, cryptographic proof of personhood becomes genuinely compelling.
But here's the catch: the project's tokenomics structure appears fundamentally misaligned with its utility thesis. The token distribution and emission schedules seem to work against long-term believers, creating incentive mismatches that undermine confidence even among those who appreciate the underlying technology direction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DarkPoolWatcher
· 9h ago
Tokenomics is really the Achilles' heel of Worldcoin. It sounds grand but falls flat in execution.
---
Identity verification is indeed urgent, but the token distribution mechanism is designed in direct opposition to the ideal, a typical case of double standards.
---
Proof of Humanity is a hot concept, but unfortunately, the team seems more concerned with how to cut corners and profit rather than truly solving the problem.
---
In an era of rampant deepfakes, on-chain identity verification is indeed needed, but I really can't understand this coin's economic model.
---
I just want to ask, are these people really building a product or just running a Ponzi scheme? The concept is great, but the tokenomics design is a joke.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 9h ago
NGL, the Worldcoin logic sounds pretty good, but the tokenomics part is really disappointing... Just having proof of humanity, what's the use, the tokens are all crashing.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 10h ago
I get the logic of worldcoin, but that set of tokenomics is really played out, completely opposite to utility.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 10h ago
Oh wow, this tokenomics is really amazing, it sounds like the left hand fighting the right hand.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 10h ago
Honestly, I buy into the Worldcoin concept, but the token design is really disappointing. Just having the proof of humanity concept isn't enough; the tokenomics are terrible.
The convergence of deepfakes, AI avatars, and synthetic voice technology has made identity verification unexpectedly urgent. Worldcoin's core proposition around proof of humanity suddenly feels less abstract and more practically necessary—when you can't trust what you see or hear anymore, cryptographic proof of personhood becomes genuinely compelling.
But here's the catch: the project's tokenomics structure appears fundamentally misaligned with its utility thesis. The token distribution and emission schedules seem to work against long-term believers, creating incentive mismatches that undermine confidence even among those who appreciate the underlying technology direction.