Don't look at the privacy sector with old-fashioned eyes anymore.
In the past, playing with privacy coins was to avoid risks. Now? Institutions are here. What they want is completely different—"Privacy within compliance."
How big is this difference? It determines whether you can survive until the next bull market.
I am optimistic about DUSK's logic because of this. It is not a money laundering tool at all, but a compliance ladder for legitimate institutions—banks, funds, large enterprises. DUSK understands this very clearly: pure anonymity has no future; only "programmable compliant privacy" is the real solution for RWA.
Imagine this: in the future, enterprises will issue bonds on-chain, demonstrating legality and compliance without revealing trade secrets. Currently, how many projects on the market can solve this problem based on ZK architecture?
The market hasn't fully realized this yet. Once everyone understands that "compliance is the ticket to entry for RWA," DUSK's price won't stay at its current level. That’s inevitable.
There’s an old saying in this circle: when it's cheap, no one asks; when it’s expensive, everyone rushes in. DUSK is currently in that state—technically solid, still building momentum, but large-scale FOMO hasn't arrived yet. That’s the nature of a value trough.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UncleWhale
· 13h ago
The logic of compliance and privacy indeed makes sense; as institutional needs change, the rules of the game must also change.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 13h ago
From the perspective of compliance and privacy, it's quite interesting, but honestly, whether DUSK can carry this banner depends on what happens next.
Sounds good, but will institutions really accept it so quickly?
There are a bunch of ZK solutions, why can DUSK win?
I've heard many times that "it's cheap, no one asks," haha.
The RWA concept has been hyped for so long, and finally someone has figured it out.
I haven't studied DUSK technology in depth, but this idea really hits the point.
What institutions need is exactly this, it makes some sense.
There are indeed very few that can compete, but it doesn't necessarily have to be DUSK.
The real test is at the low point—seeing who can survive until that moment.
Compliance and privacy might sound like a pseudo-concept, but if it can truly be implemented, it's worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 13h ago
Wow, I really didn't think of this from the perspective of compliance and privacy, but on second thought... institutional entry is inherently about whitewashing, and DUSK's game is indeed not that simple.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 13h ago
That's right, it's indeed time to change the approach for privacy coins. I believe the scarcity of compliant privacy is truly valuable.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 13h ago
Wake up, privacy coins are no longer what they used to be.
Don't look at the privacy sector with old-fashioned eyes anymore.
In the past, playing with privacy coins was to avoid risks. Now? Institutions are here. What they want is completely different—"Privacy within compliance."
How big is this difference? It determines whether you can survive until the next bull market.
I am optimistic about DUSK's logic because of this. It is not a money laundering tool at all, but a compliance ladder for legitimate institutions—banks, funds, large enterprises. DUSK understands this very clearly: pure anonymity has no future; only "programmable compliant privacy" is the real solution for RWA.
Imagine this: in the future, enterprises will issue bonds on-chain, demonstrating legality and compliance without revealing trade secrets. Currently, how many projects on the market can solve this problem based on ZK architecture?
The market hasn't fully realized this yet. Once everyone understands that "compliance is the ticket to entry for RWA," DUSK's price won't stay at its current level. That’s inevitable.
There’s an old saying in this circle: when it's cheap, no one asks; when it’s expensive, everyone rushes in. DUSK is currently in that state—technically solid, still building momentum, but large-scale FOMO hasn't arrived yet. That’s the nature of a value trough.