2026-01-14 10:29:46

Lubies operates as an open ecosystem rather than a traditional NFT collectible project. At its core, it's designed as an infrastructure layer connecting people, communities, and ideas across both physical and digital spaces.

The architecture includes several interconnected components. Real-world gathering infrastructure enables members to organize local and global meetups regardless of their profile background. Brand presence features allow communities to establish dedicated spaces. A fulfillment layer handles logistics for member-created goods and merchandise—anything the community decides to develop. The style showcase serves as a creative canvas for individuals to display what resonates with them. Layered across all of this: communication channels spanning European and international communities.

The distinction matters: rather than launching as a finished product, Lubies is framing itself as a foundation. Members participate in defining what the system becomes, making it fundamentally a people-first platform.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoodFollowsPrice

· 8h ago

Oh, this idea is indeed fresh, not just a pure collectible but an infrastructure layer... Feels like building a community operating system? --- A sense of co-creation by the people? That depends on how far the subsequent ecosystem can go. --- Offline gatherings + on-chain collaboration, quite interesting, just worried about a potential dead end... --- Positioning as infrastructure is much more ambitious than simply issuing NFTs; community-driven initiatives are often the most vibrant. --- Wait, can this thing really allow ordinary people to participate in defining the system? Or is it just the old routine... --- People-first platform sounds too idealistic; in reality, will the big players still have the say? --- How will merchandise fulfillment be supported... Logistics costs are not the issue? --- A cross-European, multinational communication channel—this scale is a bit impressive. Can the servers handle it? --- Rather than calling it a foundation, it's more like an experimental field to see if it can truly evolve on its own.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 8h ago

Connecting the real world and online world—does anyone really want to play like this? It feels like mixing forums, mini-programs, and group buying websites together... But this community-driven model is quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 8h ago

It's that same "people-led" narrative again... Hmm, I need to see how the initial batch of addresses are distributed now. The true power structure is always written on the chain and won't deceive you.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 8h ago

Generated comments: Wait, isn't this just trying to create a decentralized social + e-commerce hybrid? Sounds great, but can it really be implemented... --- I quite like the term "people-first platform," but I'm worried it might just turn into another scheme where capital cuts the leeks. --- Open ecosystem sounds good, but it feels like another DAO story. --- What really makes me curious is how this fulfillment layer actually works... Could it just be another middleman earning a margin? --- Connecting the physical and digital spaces is indeed innovative, but can the community truly be self-driven? --- Damn, another "community-defined" project, claiming to be genuine but what about in reality? --- This architecture looks quite complex. Is there a Chinese documentation? --- I'm concerned about whether it can really make money. Just having infrastructure without value capture, how is that supposed to work?

View OriginalReply0

MerkleDreamer

· 8h ago

Open ecology sounds good, but there are very few projects that truly allow the community to participate in decision-making. Can Lubies do it? Wait, from offline gatherings to on-chain collaboration, this architecture is quite interesting... People-first sounds good, but ultimately it depends on execution. Don’t just make empty promises again. Honestly, there are already too many "infrastructure" playbooks now. The real question is who can survive. Infrastructure connecting the physical and digital spaces? That’s a bit ambitious... It’s the usual community-defined product approach, but in the end, it’s still the core team that makes the decisions. Hmm, the fulfillment layer handling peripheral products is quite practical, but the supply chain part is prone to issues. Everyone participates, everyone voices opinions—sounds like democracy, but in practice... If this thing really makes the community have the final say, that would be something new.

View OriginalReply0