2026-01-14 10:30:11

Having observed many exchange creator reward programs, I always feel that the winning strategies for some activities have been decided long ago. Activities that offer a chance to win big prizes with an investment of just 0.01 USDT sound tempting, but the winners are often familiar faces. This phenomenon is quite common in the crypto world—key information is always in the hands of a few, while the majority can only watch from the sidelines.

This is quite awkward: ordinary users participate in activities to feel involved, but where is the real sense of winning? The contrast is a bit stark. What do you all think—can such incentive mechanisms truly encourage everyone's creative enthusiasm? Or is it just based on luck and skill?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayoffMiner

· 7h ago

Isn't this just a new trick to cut leeks? I've seen through it long ago.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 7h ago

ngl the "winners list" reads like a social club roster... seen this movie before during the accumulation phases. whale movement disguised as community engagement, reading between the lines here 🤔

Reply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 8h ago

Information asymmetry works like this: those in the lead have already calculated ROI long ago, and what we see is always the story after the fact.

View OriginalReply0