Recently, the market has been quite good, and it’s clear that several projects I hold are rising pretty quickly. I’ve sold quite a bit, and I actually feel a sense of relief.
A few days ago, I came across an NFT project called Fluent. I took a closer look at their airdrop logic, and it’s actually quite interesting.
I’ve seen many NFT projects airdrop tokens, but Fluent’s approach is a bit different. They don’t simply give airdrops to holders in a straightforward manner; instead, the amount and rights of the airdrop are determined based on the user’s reputation level. The greater your influence on-chain and off-chain, and the better your reputation, the higher your level, and the more tokens and privileges you receive in the airdrop.
This mechanism is somewhat like KOL funding rounds, but much broader in scope. Not only top opinion leaders can benefit, but any user who has established a good reputation in the community and has genuine influence can benefit from it. In other words, it expands the incentive scope from a few people to all contributors and reputable participants.
On-chain interaction data, off-chain community activity, personal reputation accumulation… all become dimensions for scoring. The benefit of this approach is that it can more accurately identify the project’s core supporters and contributors, making it much fairer than random airdrops.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrier
· 16h ago
Another trick with reputation levels. Whether it can really be fulfilled this time remains to be seen.
I'm just worried it will end up being another tool for insiders to harvest profits.
The Fluent scoring system sounds good, but how is off-chain data verified? Who will oversee it?
That said, compared to random airdrops, it's definitely more transparent—just depends on how well it's executed.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 16h ago
Reputation-based airdrops sound pretty good, but I'm worried it might just be another way to cut the leeks again.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 16h ago
Is this gameplay serious or just another scam to fleece investors?
The credibility level system sounds suspicious, and I have no idea what it actually entails in practice.
I'll have to wait and see how this unfolds.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 16h ago
Another reputation level smart trap; theoretically, it's perfectly fair, but in reality, it still depends on who knows how to operate...
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 16h ago
It's the reputation mechanism again. It sounds good, but I'm more concerned about how much can actually be空空空
Fluent's gameplay确实比瞎空投强, it really depends on how much you can actually get
I should have水社区 more早, now I realize it
But can on-chain data truly reflect value? It still feels容易作弊
Would this kind of激励方式 turn into a game where insiders互相吹捧
Reputation levels听着舒服, but how to prove fairness呢
Interesting, I need to check my current level
Isn't this just decentralizing the空投权力? Same old, same old
It seems有人会找漏洞刷等级 again, it's not new
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 16h ago
Reputation levels, to put it simply, still depend on activity. Probably going to get cut by big whales again.
---
This logic sounds good, but I'm just worried that in the end, it's still about who has more money and who talks more.
---
Selling at a high position is really comfortable. The effectiveness of the Fluent mechanism depends on how the follow-up execution goes.
---
Wait, isn't this just a disguised form of KYC? Feels a bit troublesome.
---
It's interesting, but I don't know if these project teams are serious or just hyping concepts again.
---
Oh, how is reputation level determined? Could it again be a game of insider information?
Recently, the market has been quite good, and it’s clear that several projects I hold are rising pretty quickly. I’ve sold quite a bit, and I actually feel a sense of relief.
A few days ago, I came across an NFT project called Fluent. I took a closer look at their airdrop logic, and it’s actually quite interesting.
I’ve seen many NFT projects airdrop tokens, but Fluent’s approach is a bit different. They don’t simply give airdrops to holders in a straightforward manner; instead, the amount and rights of the airdrop are determined based on the user’s reputation level. The greater your influence on-chain and off-chain, and the better your reputation, the higher your level, and the more tokens and privileges you receive in the airdrop.
This mechanism is somewhat like KOL funding rounds, but much broader in scope. Not only top opinion leaders can benefit, but any user who has established a good reputation in the community and has genuine influence can benefit from it. In other words, it expands the incentive scope from a few people to all contributors and reputable participants.
On-chain interaction data, off-chain community activity, personal reputation accumulation… all become dimensions for scoring. The benefit of this approach is that it can more accurately identify the project’s core supporters and contributors, making it much fairer than random airdrops.