Imagine an extreme scenario: a well-known cross-chain bridge custodian suddenly collapses, and the private keys are already lost. Hundreds of thousands of wrapped assets in circulation instantly lose their backing, and their prices plummet to zero. All lending positions collateralized with these assets are liquidated en masse, and the protocol accumulates massive bad debt. The stablecoins issued through these assets would also face a collapse in confidence.



This hypothetical may seem exaggerated, but it exposes a harsh reality: Not your keys, not your coins.

Wrapped assets (such as BTC, Ethereum, or assets from other blockchains transferred across chains) are essentially IOUs issued by custodians. You do not hold the real assets; instead, you hold a credit promise from the issuer. Once that promise is broken, the assets vanish. Worse, this risk propagates through DeFi lending protocols layer by layer.

So how to avoid this? The answer is simple: prioritize native assets.

DeFi protocols are generally aware of this. They mitigate risk by adjusting LTV (Loan-to-Value ratio)—wrapped assets typically have a significantly lower LTV than native assets. The straightforward logic is: the higher the risk, the less you can borrow.

My personal asset allocation principle is clear: Native > Wrapped. When choosing collateral, prioritize native assets like BNB over various wrapped tokens transferred across chains. This is not conservative; it’s understanding the underlying logic of the crypto market.
BTC2,19%
ETH1,72%
BNB0,07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleDreamervip
· 10h ago
It's the same old theory... But to be honest, I've seen too many cross-chain bridge explosions, so caution is still necessary. It's a common topic, but it really should be taken seriously. Wrapped assets are just a ticking time bomb; it's about time to stay away from them. That's why I only deal with native assets; everything else is gambling. Deep enough, it seems I need to adjust my collateral allocation. No more words, I need to quickly get rid of all wrapped assets. It's true, but the problem is that there aren't many good native assets.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFishvip
· 10h ago
Cross-chain bridge explosions can really happen at any time. I still vividly remember the Poly Network incident... Honestly, I try to avoid those wrapped assets now; native assets are more reliable. That's right, the LTV risk control logic can indeed save lives, but only if you survive the explosion moment... Wait, does this logic also apply to stablecoins? I keep asking myself—am I really holding coins? Brilliant analogy, comparing wrapped assets to IOUs, directly hitting the pain point of Web3. Actually, the true saying should be "Not your keys, not your coins"—it should be changed to "Not on mainnet, not your coin."
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 10h ago
That's why I prefer to stake BNB rather than mess with those cross-chain projects, they're way too fragile. Wrapped assets are just a ticking time bomb; whether it explodes depends on the integrity of the custodian. Not your keys really isn't just talk; you only understand after losing. Every day you hear people hyping interoperability, but the risk is all on you—it's crazy. Those guys who rely on wrapped assets for lending should really be careful; the protocol won't really help you bear the loss. Stick to native assets; only by staying alive can you make money. This logic is sound. With so many cross-chain bridges being hacked, who’s still going all-in on wrapped assets? Native assets are the best, even if there are fewer options, the sleep quality is much better haha.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionistvip
· 10h ago
Another horror story of "bridge explosion"… But honestly, this time it's explained quite clearly. Wrapping assets is just a ticking time bomb, it will blow up sooner or later. I cleared out the cross-chain junk long ago, now I only deal with native assets, and my sleep quality has improved a lot.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVotervip
· 10h ago
Wrapping assets is a risk; it will explode sooner or later. I've seen it happen too many times. It's better to play it safe with native assets like BNB and ETH, which you can sleep peacefully knowing they're secure.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)