2026-01-14 11:21:22

Many people have misconceptions about commission rebates. To put it simply, rebate is never a numbers game; it’s about the value of the services you provide. Even if I don’t give back a single cent, the clients who are supposed to come will still come because they value professionalism and trust. This money should rightfully be my service fee.

Within a compliant framework, the maximum rebate a major exchange can offer is 20%. If you see a figure exceeding this, there’s often a risk behind the operation—once regulatory scrutiny occurs, the money you received becomes an illusion.

Interestingly, some people collect membership fees while also offering rebates to attract users, and they constantly watch others’ rebate policies for excitement. This only shows one thing: the business logic itself is flawed, and the money naturally won’t flow in.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VirtualRichDream

· 6h ago

That's right, a bunch of people are still obsessively comparing rebate ratios, but they completely don't understand that the service itself is at the top of the pyramid. Those with over 20%? I really don't dare to touch them; risk control awareness is too poor. Those who charge membership fees and also give rebates—aren't they just contradicting themselves? Trust is valuable, everyone. Staring at the rebate numbers every day, half of the customer loyalty has already disappeared.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 6h ago

I think the 20% red line threshold is very accurately described. From historical data and a quantitative perspective, projects exceeding this number tend to fail in the next regulatory cycle, and the risks are indeed seriously underestimated. Legitimate business operations don't need to rely on rebate tricks to attract people. This is similar to technical bottoming; the fundamental factors are the decisive ones, and rebates are just short-term tools for T+ trading. For those who charge membership fees and also offer rebates, my quantitative model has long flagged these projects—contradictory business logic, problems will eventually arise. Customers still get on board without any rebates? This indicates that the supply side has core competitiveness. In comparison, users attracted by rebates have the worst stickiness; once policies change, they will leave immediately. I've been observing this phenomenon since 2017. Now, the market structure is evolving more clearly—professionalism is the key to surviving cycles, while the rebate approach is ultimately an illusion.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 6h ago

Reliable people indeed don't need to rely on commissions to attract others, I agree with this principle. High commissions are a trap, sooner or later they'll backfire. That's right, professionalism is the real hard currency. Really, I don't touch those who offer crazy commissions, it feels like there's a lot of shady stuff behind it. Service fees are just service fees, don't mess with those flashy tricks, isn't it tiring? The most annoying are those who collect membership fees while trying to ride the trend—it's basically a suicidal marketing tactic. Be aware of the 20% red line; if it exceeds that, be cautious. The core competitiveness is right here; who still cares about that little commission? Commissions may seem sweet, but in reality, it's like drinking poison to quench thirst—wake up, everyone. If trust is maximized, whether there's a commission or not, clients will come naturally.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 6h ago

Ultimately, trust is more valuable; the small numbers from commissions don't hold up.

View OriginalReply0