Super Instructions keeps the bytecode untouched—that's the clever part. What happens next is where the magic lives: when the client runs the code, it scans for recurring opcode patterns and consolidates them into a single optimized instruction.
Take SI_PUSH_PUSH_ADD as an example. Instead of executing three separate operations, the runtime bundles them together. The end result? Identical outcomes, identical gas accounting. The real win is cutting down the interpreter steps—fewer cycles, same guarantees.
It's subtle but effective optimization at the execution layer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlacker
· 10h ago
Wait, so this thing just merges duplicate operation codes? How about the performance improvement? Is it really that amazing?
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 10h ago
This optimization idea is indeed excellent—bundling repetitive operations into a single command... The key to saving gas still depends on reducing the number of loop steps.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 10h ago
Oh, so these are super instructions, huh? It sounds like bundling repetitive opcodes together... A handy trick to save gas indeed.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 10h ago
Hey, this idea is quite interesting. Packaging repetitive opcode patterns into a single instruction seems like a clever approach. But the real question is, how does it perform in practice?
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 10h ago
ngl this is exactly what I wanted to see, bundling repetitive operations into a single command... saving gas without changing the logic, this is true optimization, not some flashy gimmick.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just packaging repetitive operations, not very complicated, but it can indeed save gas.
Super Instructions keeps the bytecode untouched—that's the clever part. What happens next is where the magic lives: when the client runs the code, it scans for recurring opcode patterns and consolidates them into a single optimized instruction.
Take SI_PUSH_PUSH_ADD as an example. Instead of executing three separate operations, the runtime bundles them together. The end result? Identical outcomes, identical gas accounting. The real win is cutting down the interpreter steps—fewer cycles, same guarantees.
It's subtle but effective optimization at the execution layer.