The bundling pattern in this project reveals an interesting concentration setup. Several major node clusters show varied distribution across the bubblemap ecosystem: 7%, 4.4%, 6%, and 2.5% respectively. What stands out is that wallets originating from major trading platforms account for 37% of the holdings—a notably high proportion that suggests significant institutional or platform-level exposure. This kind of concentration warrants attention from traders monitoring whale movements and capital flow patterns in this particular token ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeZeroBasis
· 11h ago
37% exchange address? You need to be very careful.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 11h ago
37% held by exchange wallets, which is outrageous. It seems that big players are finding new ways to harvest retail investors again.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 11h ago
Trading platform wallets account for 37%? That's outrageous, it feels like something's going to go wrong.
The bundling pattern in this project reveals an interesting concentration setup. Several major node clusters show varied distribution across the bubblemap ecosystem: 7%, 4.4%, 6%, and 2.5% respectively. What stands out is that wallets originating from major trading platforms account for 37% of the holdings—a notably high proportion that suggests significant institutional or platform-level exposure. This kind of concentration warrants attention from traders monitoring whale movements and capital flow patterns in this particular token ecosystem.