The token circulation of the Samara project exhibits a relatively balanced distribution. The team holds only 4.7%, and the project team states that there are no snipers or insiders cashing out early. The developer is alohquant. Major holding addresses include Gr3g, PStar, Nach, and M4ks.
On-chain data shows that there is no significant large-scale concentration of tokens. The concentration of exchange-related wallets reaches 52.5%, which is relatively reasonable for a new project. Binance series wallets have a more dispersed distribution, avoiding single-point risk. Overall, Samara's token allocation structure is relatively transparent, with early holdings distributed fairly evenly, avoiding extreme concentration risks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The token circulation of the Samara project exhibits a relatively balanced distribution. The team holds only 4.7%, and the project team states that there are no snipers or insiders cashing out early. The developer is alohquant. Major holding addresses include Gr3g, PStar, Nach, and M4ks.
On-chain data shows that there is no significant large-scale concentration of tokens. The concentration of exchange-related wallets reaches 52.5%, which is relatively reasonable for a new project. Binance series wallets have a more dispersed distribution, avoiding single-point risk. Overall, Samara's token allocation structure is relatively transparent, with early holdings distributed fairly evenly, avoiding extreme concentration risks.