2026-01-14 12:23:11

Holding LUNC for 332 days, I recently looked at the data and felt quite touched. The total supply of this token has shrunk from 6.5 trillion to 6.47 trillion. The number may not seem large, but if you compare this deflation rate to mainstream blockchains, LUNC's performance is actually quite impressive—conservatively estimated to rank in the top five among the top ten blockchains.

Honestly, achieving true deflation is a plus for any blockchain. But it sounds easier than it is to actually do. Not all blockchains with hundreds of billions or thousands of billions in scale can sustain deflation. In contrast, LUNC, a blockchain with a market cap of only about $200 million, has implemented a real token burn mechanism. This alone shows the project's emphasis on its economic model.

Every time I see the deflation progress bar move forward, I feel this is what a blockchain project should look like—using solid data to speak, and increasing token scarcity over time. This kind of virtuous cycle is worth long-term attention.

LUNC0,85%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

digital_archaeologist

· 1h ago

It's been 332 days, and this deflation rate is indeed impressive, much more reliable than those major public chains. Not many projects truly dare to do token burns, I respect LUNC for that. This is the real logic of scarcity. Let the data speak; it's really that simple. Holding for such a long time, the gamble is whether this economic model can survive.

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking

· 5h ago

Still holding on after 332 days? I'm honestly amazed too, haha.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 5h ago

It's been 332 days, and the deflation speed really hasn't been wasted. It's much more reliable than those major public chains.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 5h ago

It's been 332 days of holding on tightly, really impressive. Seeing actual burn data makes me feel more at ease, much better than those who just talk without action. However, discussing deflation for a public chain with a market cap of 200 million is a bit premature. When will it catch up to the top projects before boasting? Wait, can this deflation rate really outpace mainstream public chains? I feel like the data might be exaggerated. Those who persist are all wolves; anyway, I've already given up. Let's see how things develop later.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainMessenger

· 6h ago

It's been 332 days and we're still holding on. To be honest, the speed of this deflation has really shocked me. I firmly believe in LUNC's deflation mechanism, which is much more reliable than those public chains that only shout slogans. Wait, can 6.47 trillion really push the price up? That's the real key. Honestly, there are very few public chains with small market caps that can truly implement deflation. This wave of LUNC is indeed top-notch. This is faith. Only persistent deflation can lead to explosive growth in the future. How should I put it? The data is very encouraging, but the fact that the increase didn't meet expectations is a bit disappointing. If this deflation pace can be maintained, looking back two years from now, you might regret today's price.

View OriginalReply0