Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about Bitcoin's market trend, and many people are feeling confused about the future direction. Let's analyze the situation based on actual conditions.



From the data, since November last year, the market has been hesitant to decisively break through the key level of 96,000. It took three full months to digest the resistance at 95,000, which in itself indicates that—the market lacks sustained buying support. On a macro level, commodities, the stock market, and Japanese government bonds are all competing for liquidity in the financial markets, which is an objective reality.

Last night, BTC indeed surged to around 96,500, appearing very fierce on the surface, as if aiming for a $100,000 breakthrough. But if you observe carefully, this pulse seems more like a test—mainly to clear out short leverage positions. The actual breakout conditions are not yet in place.

The upcoming rhythm might be as follows: first, a small rebound, then after the short leverage positions are exhausted, Bitcoin is likely to adjust back to around 90,000. Then, as the commodities and stock markets experience a pullback, the liquidity that was drawn away will flow back into the crypto market. Only at this point will Bitcoin have the chance to stabilize above 100,000 and move higher.

Here’s an important point to understand— the speed from 90,000 to 100,000 USD is actually quite fast, but the key is whether it can hold. Any sustainable trend ultimately depends on the combined effort of institutions and retail investors, which boils down to profit motives. Currently, the crypto market has not yet formed a highly concentrated liquidity pattern, so patience may be wiser than rushing in.
BTC3,32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandsCriminalvip
· 7h ago
I got cut again, this time I got wiped out while trying to short during the test... Really, just wait for that wave of correction. Anyway, I have no money left. If liquidity isn't focused, don't bother. I'm a living example of that. When the non-ferrous metals pull back, I'll go all in. I don't believe in evil anymore. This time, I really want to bottom fish. I've been fooled three times, it's my turn to make money.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFearvip
· 7h ago
Once again, it's the same story about testing the market, feeling like we're always waiting for liquidity to flow back. After the leverage explosion, can it rise to 100,000? I highly doubt it. Stuck at 95,000 for three months, is this time really different... Wait, when will institutions seriously start entering the market? Last night, it died at 96,500, is this what they call very fierce? Liquidity has been drained by the stock market, so things are indeed a bit tough on our side. I've heard the idea of reaching 100,000 too many times, but what was the result?
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1vip
· 7h ago
Trying to test the market again? It feels like this move is just to clear leverage. Wait, is liquidity really that tight? It seems like non-ferrous metals are competing with us for money. Roughly 90,000 should be maintained, or else the mentality will collapse. The 100,000 threshold definitely requires institutions to step in and take over. Three months to grind to 95,000, this pace is really slow.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42vip
· 7h ago
It's the same old story, testing the leverage and clearing the shorts. I just want to know if the bears can really break out. Waiting for liquidity to flow back? Probably waiting until the flowers wither. Digesting a resistance level in three months, how unwanted is that? Is 100,000 really that hard? Feels like this time it's just a fake move. Institutions working together to push, sounds good, but in reality, everyone is doing their own thing. If this logic continues, it will probably take a year or two to break through. I just want to know if this rebound is a real breakout or just another trap for the latecomers. Liquidity competition, honestly, just means there's no money to enter the market. Waiting for a correction to 90,000? I bet it will drop straight to 87,000. Standing firm at 100,000 is a joke; even holding at 96,000 is difficult.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMastervip
· 8h ago
Still testing the market again, it seems I need to continue waiting patiently. Liquidity is not focused; don't rush to go all-in. 90,000 to 100,000 is not the end point; the key is whether it can hold. Waiting for the metals and stock markets to pull back—that's the real buying opportunity. Taking three months to digest a resistance level; I'm really fed up with the market's temper.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 8h ago
Only digesting 95k in three months? That's outrageous, a clear warning of capital concentration. Wait, about the liquidity being drained... Are you sure it's not big players manipulating the market? What does the on-chain data say? Holding onto 100,000 is the real test. Why are you in such a hurry now? I'm just waiting to see who will be the last to take the bait.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.ethvip
· 8h ago
I'm tired of this kind of "testing the market and clearing leverage" talk Wait, will liquidity really flow back? Feels like I've been waiting forever Oh my god, in these three months I've been grinding to 95,000, how much confidence does that take? Stabilize at 100,000? Don't make me laugh, let's first see if we can hold onto 96 instead It's nicely called "patient waiting," but actually, I haven't decided how to rush in yet
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)