Recently, there has been a lot of discussion, and the combination of Walrus Protocol and Sui network is indeed quite interesting. The benefits of native integration are obvious—directly leveraging Sui's high-performance consensus to handle storage proofs, which can significantly reduce verification costs. This is very attractive to developers. Compared to other cross-chain storage solutions that feel patchwork, this protocol-level native support offers a smooth experience that it should have.
From an economic incentive perspective, through WAL's incentive design, storage nodes are tightly integrated into the ecosystem. Such stickiness cannot be achieved through promotion alone. In simple terms, Walrus is demonstrating a reality: truly commercial-grade decentralized storage performance must be built on deep integration of underlying architecture. It’s not just simple cross-chain bridging, but fundamental symbiosis. This approach indeed stands out among the current storage solutions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IronHeadMiner
· 7h ago
This is the right way, unlike those pseudo-L1s that boast about storage every day, but still stick to the old cross-chain tinkering. The architecture concept of Walrus really convinced me.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 7h ago
Talking about strategy on paper for so long, Walrus has finally tied storage and public chains together this time, no longer relying on half-baked solutions like cross-chain bridges.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 7h ago
Native integration truly wins, but the cross-chain patches are quite annoying with so many of them.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 8h ago
Native integration is really awesome, unlike those patchwork solutions that require daily patches.
Using Sui's consensus to handle storage proofs significantly reduces costs. Can developers not be excited?
The approach of incentivizing WAL to keep nodes engaged is much more reliable than just hype and promotion.
To put it simply, the underlying architecture must be deeply integrated; a simple cross-chain setup can't support real commercial-grade storage.
Looking at Walrus's approach now, it definitely feels a bit different.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 8h ago
I agree with native integration of this logic; it's definitely much more comfortable than those glue solutions.
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion, and the combination of Walrus Protocol and Sui network is indeed quite interesting. The benefits of native integration are obvious—directly leveraging Sui's high-performance consensus to handle storage proofs, which can significantly reduce verification costs. This is very attractive to developers. Compared to other cross-chain storage solutions that feel patchwork, this protocol-level native support offers a smooth experience that it should have.
From an economic incentive perspective, through WAL's incentive design, storage nodes are tightly integrated into the ecosystem. Such stickiness cannot be achieved through promotion alone. In simple terms, Walrus is demonstrating a reality: truly commercial-grade decentralized storage performance must be built on deep integration of underlying architecture. It’s not just simple cross-chain bridging, but fundamental symbiosis. This approach indeed stands out among the current storage solutions.