Future ICOs will likely become reputation-gated from a practical standpoint.



It's counterintuitive to accept all participants without any screening mechanism. Put yourself in a project team's position—there are clear pain points:

• Bot participation skewing allocation metrics
• Wallet patterns showing dump-on-listing intent
• Participants with zero product utility expectations

Reputation-based filtering emerges as the most efficient solution here. It naturally filters out bad-faith actors while ensuring genuine community members get access. This isn't about exclusivity for its own sake—it's about aligning incentives between projects and their actual user base.

The projects that adopt early reputation systems will likely see healthier token distribution and community dynamics down the line.
TOKEN-0,25%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCriervip
· 6h ago
It should have been done this way earlier, so fewer new retail investors get caught.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 6h ago
Uh... reputation gate sounds good, but who will define what "genuine" means? It feels like it's going to turn into an insiders' club again.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 6h ago
ngl this is the reality, it should have been played like this a long time ago... Those bots and dumpers are really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 6h ago
Reputation-based filtering will eventually be implemented, or else bot wars will never end.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)