This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BasementAlchemist
· 3h ago
I just said this wave is a bit bearish, the liquidity pile here won't break through directly
---
It's that old trick again, dip to eat the stop-loss orders and then rebound
---
92500 is really stuck, feels like it needs to drop another wave
---
Market participants decide? Ha, isn't that just looking at the mood of the whales
---
Watching this range and waiting to see, anyway, one direction will move eventually
---
Break through directly? I don't believe it, it's more realistic to shake out the traders first
---
This liquidity accumulation is too obvious, feels like a trap
---
Everyone's betting on the direction, I bet it will go down first and then see
---
What's the key point to watch? Nothing, just waiting to be cut
---
Such thick liquidity going straight up? That's wishful thinking
---
Stuck at 92 to 93 like this, the next step depends on whether the buying pressure is strong enough
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 3h ago
Here we go again, that whole liquidity stacking thing—whether it works or not really depends on the market maker's mood, right?
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 4h ago
Hmm, it's the same "liquidity trap" theory again. Can it really break through this time?
---
92500 to 93300 is such a small margin, waiting to be eaten? I bet it drops first.
---
Break through directly? Dream on, it definitely needs to wash out the stops first.
---
Same old story, break first then establish, and during the break, some people will get cut.
---
Key point? Basically, it's a casino—whoever has more chips gets to decide.
---
Whether it breaks through or not doesn't matter; what's important is not to get caught here. I'll wait and see.
---
With such obvious liquidity accumulation, institutions must have already been watching.
---
Everyone's guessing online, but I think it's uncertain. The technicals aren't as clear as they seem.
---
Forget it, no matter how it moves, I'll get cut anyway. Might as well lie flat.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 4h ago
Why does it feel like we're repeating the old trick of crashing first and then pulling... It still depends on how the whales play it.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 4h ago
Hmm... This move is either to directly crash down to absorb liquidity or to go all-in and surge upward, betting on the market maker's mentality.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 4h ago
Hmm, it's the same old trick of smashing first and then pulling back, the dealer's favorite game.
I don't believe it will break directly; it will definitely need to shake out the traders first.
From 92,500 to 93,300, there's just not enough room.
Let's wait and see who breaks first.
The guys betting on a straight up move will probably have to cut losses again this time.
Liquidity piling up here means no good news.
比特币92,500-93,300美元区间流动性堆积,后市能否直接向上突破?
【币界】最近盯比特币的朋友应该都注意到了——BTC在92,500到93,300美元这个区间堆积了可观的流动性。现在市场里有个有趣的问题在流传:比特币会不会先向下探一探,把这些流动性吃掉,然后再发起新一波上升行情?这种先破后立的走势在加密市场其实不少见,得看市场参与者的决定了。有人觉得会触发止损,也有人赌它直接向上突破。反正这个价格带就是个关键的观察点。