Worth flagging that concerns around Edel's token distribution patterns have surfaced repeatedly in community discussions over recent months. The focus keeps coming back to wallet concentration metrics and the overall transparency gap in how tokens are allocated and held. Multiple observers raised these red flags publicly before, yet accountability on these governance questions remains elusive. It underscores a broader pattern in the space—when wallets become too concentrated early on, it often signals centralization risks that warrant ongoing scrutiny.

TOKEN-1,43%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWallflowervip
· 19h ago
It's the same old story again, Edel's transparency is exceptionally poor.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 22h ago
Same old story, the discussion about wallet concentration has been going on for so long and still no progress? That's it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 22h ago
It's the same old story, I've seen it coming. With such high wallet concentration, how can you still claim decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTraumavip
· 22h ago
Once again, the same old tricks... centralized wallets, poor transparency, lack of accountability. Edel's move is just like many other projects. It's really frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 22h ago
It's the same old trick... Early on, they concentrate funds in a wallet, and those who run away later are all like this.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)