X (formerly Twitter) recently made a major announcement. On January 15, platform product lead Nikita Bier officially announced changes to the developer API policy, directly disabling a category of applications—those that grow through rewarding users for posting, known in the industry as InfoFi. In simple terms: X is no longer playing the game of making money from posting.
The logic behind this decision is straightforward. While these applications are creative, their side effects are too obvious:大量AI生成的垃圾内容(业内叫AI slop)堆满了平台,评论区更是spam遍地,整个用户体验被拉低。X宁可放弃这些企业客户支付的百万美元API费用,也要把生态清理干净。诚意还是有的。
The project most affected is KAITO. Its flagship product, Yaps, is centered around incentivized posting and leaderboards, with the entire operation built on X’s API. Once the ban was announced, the system immediately became unusable. Market reaction was swift—$KAITO tokens plummeted 15-23% in a short period, dropping from around $0.70 to between $0.54 and $0.58. The related Yapybaras NFTs fared even worse, with floor prices halving by over 50%.
But KAITO’s founder Yu Hu responded quickly. Instead of sitting idly, he immediately announced a strategic shift: gradually shutting down Yaps and the incentive leaderboard system, moving toward a new product line called "Kaito Studio." The new direction abandons the unlicensed open incentive model, switching to curated and tiered collaborations, while expanding to platforms like YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, and others. In other words, no longer relying on a single platform, but repositioning through cross-platform marketing tools.
KAITO’s experience is not an isolated case. The entire InfoFi sector has fallen into trouble. Tokens of similar projects like Cookie DAO, Wallchain, and LOUD also dropped 10-20% accordingly. The recent market cap loss in this niche is roughly around 10%. It seems that X’s policy adjustment has directly exposed the vulnerabilities within the Web3 sector.
From another perspective, this incident highlights a bigger issue: when incentive mechanisms are poorly designed, even the best ideas can easily turn into tools for spam and garbage content. Platforms are taking content quality more seriously, and project teams need to think about how to innovate within compliant frameworks. The rapid iteration approach of projects like KAITO might offer some lessons—since the original path is blocked, horizontal expansion is a smarter move than stubbornly pushing forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
probably_nothing_anon
· 4h ago
Another wave of rug pulls, InfoFi was long overdue for death.
---
KAITO reacts quickly, but this time they really took a hard hit.
---
Cleaning up spam content on X is fine, but the underlying projects are still getting hammered.
---
Horizontal expansion sounds good, but how many can actually survive?
---
They’re willing to give up API fees worth millions of dollars—Elon is really serious this time.
---
Why does it feel like Web3 is always getting slapped in the face by policy makers? When will it finally settle down?
---
Yaps is dead, but the idea of incentivized posting was always a pseudo-demand.
---
NFTs cut in half, holders are probably ready to smash their screens now.
---
At the end of the day, it’s still greed—thinking you can make money just by posting. It’s time to wake up from that dream.
---
I’d give Yu Hu’s recent moves a passing grade; at least they didn’t just give up.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 4h ago
Another cut sector, Info Fi is completely cooled down.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 4h ago
Oh no, InfoFi was directly cut this time. It feels a bit satisfying but also a bit helpless.
Yu Hu responded quickly; switching tracks is definitely better than sticking to the old one.
It seems that in the future, we will have to rely on genuine content to survive. The good days for the spammers are over.
Being able to survive with KAITO is already good; other projects probably need to rethink their survival strategies.
X's move clearly shows that no matter how fancy the incentives are, they can't outweigh the aftereffects of garbage content.
This is the moment when blockchain meets reality—imagination must give way to governance.
Cross-platform development is indeed a safer route; relying on a single platform should have been abandoned long ago.
A thorough market cleanup is necessary for the survivors to go further.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 4h ago
I have to say, X's move this time is quite aggressive, directly cutting the entire InfoFi sector, and KAITO's halving is well-deserved.
Haha, now those projects that rely on spamming to make money are completely out of luck.
Cross-platform shifting is still a good approach, it all depends on how many can survive.
There is too much spam content, and X's cleanup is also a helpless move. Finally, a platform is taking the ecological quality seriously.
Faith has collapsed, let's see if any other sectors will be cut next week.
KAITO responded quickly, but whether this new model can save the day is still uncertain.
Yu Hu's move to expand horizontally is indeed clever, but now competition on platforms like TikTok is even fiercer, so it's uncertain.
One ban can wipe out a hundred million in market value, Web3 is really fragile.
To be honest, InfoFi was always operating on the edge, it should have been regulated long ago.
KAITO's Yaps really got used for spamming, no wonder X can't stand it, the ecosystem is too trash.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 5h ago
Another platform is starting to clean up the trash, InfoFi really deserves to be cursed.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 5h ago
honestly, if you run a basic regression analysis on KAITO's pivot strategy against historical platform dependency failure rates, the correlation matrix screams survivorship bias. Yu Hu got lucky, that's all.
X (formerly Twitter) recently made a major announcement. On January 15, platform product lead Nikita Bier officially announced changes to the developer API policy, directly disabling a category of applications—those that grow through rewarding users for posting, known in the industry as InfoFi. In simple terms: X is no longer playing the game of making money from posting.
The logic behind this decision is straightforward. While these applications are creative, their side effects are too obvious:大量AI生成的垃圾内容(业内叫AI slop)堆满了平台,评论区更是spam遍地,整个用户体验被拉低。X宁可放弃这些企业客户支付的百万美元API费用,也要把生态清理干净。诚意还是有的。
The project most affected is KAITO. Its flagship product, Yaps, is centered around incentivized posting and leaderboards, with the entire operation built on X’s API. Once the ban was announced, the system immediately became unusable. Market reaction was swift—$KAITO tokens plummeted 15-23% in a short period, dropping from around $0.70 to between $0.54 and $0.58. The related Yapybaras NFTs fared even worse, with floor prices halving by over 50%.
But KAITO’s founder Yu Hu responded quickly. Instead of sitting idly, he immediately announced a strategic shift: gradually shutting down Yaps and the incentive leaderboard system, moving toward a new product line called "Kaito Studio." The new direction abandons the unlicensed open incentive model, switching to curated and tiered collaborations, while expanding to platforms like YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, and others. In other words, no longer relying on a single platform, but repositioning through cross-platform marketing tools.
KAITO’s experience is not an isolated case. The entire InfoFi sector has fallen into trouble. Tokens of similar projects like Cookie DAO, Wallchain, and LOUD also dropped 10-20% accordingly. The recent market cap loss in this niche is roughly around 10%. It seems that X’s policy adjustment has directly exposed the vulnerabilities within the Web3 sector.
From another perspective, this incident highlights a bigger issue: when incentive mechanisms are poorly designed, even the best ideas can easily turn into tools for spam and garbage content. Platforms are taking content quality more seriously, and project teams need to think about how to innovate within compliant frameworks. The rapid iteration approach of projects like KAITO might offer some lessons—since the original path is blocked, horizontal expansion is a smarter move than stubbornly pushing forward.