Blockchain Investigator Turns Tables on McGregor Over NFT Allegations

The Plot Twist: Analyst Questions McGregor’s Own Digital Token History

A prominent blockchain analyst has thrown McGregor’s accusations right back at him. Just days after the UFC fighter publicly attacked his long-time rival over cryptocurrency dealings, the on-chain expert highlighted McGregor’s own involvement in a questionable digital assets venture, suggesting the fighter may not be the credible accuser he claims to be.

The escalating feud between two combat sports titans now extends far beyond the octagon and into the world of digital collectibles—a territory where neither appears on solid moral ground.

McGregor’s Scam Allegations Against Nurmagomedov

The controversy erupted on November 26 when McGregor publicly targeted Nurmagomedov, claiming the retired champion leveraged his late father abdulmanap nurmagomedov’s memory and Dagestani cultural heritage to defraud supporters through an NFT initiative.

At the center of the dispute sits the “Papakha” collection—a series of 29,000 digital assets depicting the traditional sheepskin hat associated with Dagestani culture. The project moved rapidly: it sold out within a single day and reportedly generated substantial revenue.

The backlash intensified when Nurmagomedov subsequently wiped all promotional material from his social platforms. McGregor capitalized on this move, questioning how anyone could believe a “good guy” would exploit family legacy and cultural symbols to peddle digital collectibles, then erase the evidence.

Nurmagomedov’s Defense and the Counterattack

Nurmagomedov’s representatives pushed back forcefully, dismissing McGregor as dishonest. They framed the NFTs as authentic “exclusive digital gifts bearing intrinsic value,” designed to preserve and celebrate Dagestani traditions in digital form.

However, their defense didn’t defuse the situation—it intensified it.

The Blockchain Analyst Enters: McGregor’s Own NFT Problem

Within hours, the blockchain analyst intercepted the debate, presenting a striking mirror image of McGregor’s accusation. The investigator reposted McGregor’s assault, then posed a pointed question: Could anyone genuinely believe “good guy McGregor” would harness his reputation and Irish cultural identity to defraud fans through digital tokens, subsequently destroying the record?

The analyst backed this rhetorical question with specific evidence: a 2022 NFT project titled “McGregor Realm” that the fighter personally promoted. The implication was unmistakable—McGregor’s hands were far from clean in the digital asset space.

The Irony Nobody Can Ignore

The escalating accusations reveal a broader pattern: celebrity involvement in NFT ventures frequently blurs ethical lines. McGregor’s willingness to condemn Nurmagomedov’s project while glossing over his own digital token history exposes the selective moral standards often applied in these disputes.

Both fighters leveraged fan bases and personal brands to promote blockchain-based ventures. Both projects sparked controversy. Yet McGregor positioned himself as the accuser rather than the accused—a stance the analyst effectively dismantled through direct comparison.