Builders, not breakers—that's the philosophy shaping how leading venture firms operate today. In an ecosystem where founders need support rather than criticism, a16z has embedded this principle into something tangible: a written culture code that every team member must pledge to uphold. The commitment is clear: no public attacks on founders or startups. This isn't just corporate speak—it's a structural decision. By making culture doctrine rather than casual practice, the firm ensures that defending innovation isn't left to individual judgment. It's the difference between hoping people act right and building systems where they have to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyBro
· 6h ago
a16z's move is actually brilliant—by turning culture into a set of rules, no one dares to speak nonsense, unlike some VCs who just talk big all day.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 6h ago
a16z's approach is impressive, turning culture into clauses that explicitly prohibit publicly criticizing founders, truly treating the system as a weapon.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 6h ago
builders not breakers This set of arguments sounds so comfortable, much better than those VCs who diss entrepreneurs every day.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 6h ago
a16z's move is actually about institutionalizing good culture, so that later entrants won't speak recklessly and cause harm. Compared to those organizations that talk about ideals but have employees speaking different things, this move is much more effective.
Builders, not breakers—that's the philosophy shaping how leading venture firms operate today. In an ecosystem where founders need support rather than criticism, a16z has embedded this principle into something tangible: a written culture code that every team member must pledge to uphold. The commitment is clear: no public attacks on founders or startups. This isn't just corporate speak—it's a structural decision. By making culture doctrine rather than casual practice, the firm ensures that defending innovation isn't left to individual judgment. It's the difference between hoping people act right and building systems where they have to.