The crypto market's famous four-year cycle might not be as inevitable as many believe. According to insights from Grayscale's research leadership, it's not a fixed clock governing digital assets—rather, macro economic forces are what truly move the needle. When you look at how traditional finance cycles, geopolitical shifts, and monetary policy reshape investor behavior, you start seeing why crypto markets respond to broader conditions. The cycle narrative makes for easy storytelling, but the real driver? It's the macroeconomic landscape, constantly shifting underneath.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MrDecodervip
· 1h ago
The macro perspective is indeed key; the four-year cycle theory of Bitcoin should have been debunked long ago.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 4h ago
Well... to put it simply, macroeconomics is the parent, and the four-year cycle theory is indeed too romanticized.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatchervip
· 4h ago
Macroeconomics is the real behind-the-scenes boss; the four-year cycle should have been discarded long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 4h ago
Well, if that's the case, then the four-year cycle is just a story... The real factors that can move the price are still the macroeconomic fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 4h ago
The idea of a four-year cycle is heard quite often; actually, it's just macroeconomics playing tricks.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)