Three months ago, I already shifted my strategy, and recently I finally made up my mind to abandon the previous approach. To be honest, the previous verbal promotion did attract attention, but the problem is—even if the information shared is truly useful, people are easily distracted by appearances and miss the real value.
Instead of constantly worrying, it's better to focus on the quality of the project itself. Good projects will speak for themselves; whether they are overly packaged or not, there will always be people interested. My personal business mainly focuses on exchange rebate programs. I originally planned to operate discreetly, but unexpectedly, I stepped into the InfoFi track.
The change in content strategy has made me realize one thing: true value is not about how much you say, but what you say. Thanks to this period of reflection, and thank you all for your companionship. Moving forward, I will continue to do what I should.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_not_broke
· 10h ago
Now I finally understand, sometimes the more aggressively you hype it up, the easier it is to mess up.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 10h ago
Doing things low-key is indeed appreciated, but then jumping into InfoFi... isn't that quite contradictory?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 10h ago
Hey, I know this trick too well. Blowing smoke for half a day is not as practical as a real airdrop with genuine silver and gold.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 10h ago
Well, he's quite honest. Basically, just do less bragging and more work.
---
A low-profile approach is good, but do people still believe in it now?
---
That's reasonable. No matter how much you spend on packaging, you can't sell a bad project. The reverse is also true.
---
The past three months of shifting must have been tough, but it seems you've gained some clarity.
---
Nice attitude, but how much can you really earn from exchange rebates? I'd like to hear the actual situation.
---
Sounds good, but in the end, it's all about who can cut the most comfortably.
---
Finally, someone dares to admit that the previous approach was just marketing hype. That's rare.
---
Good projects will speak for themselves? Bro, that's too idealistic. Who's paying attention without hype now?
---
I'm tired of stories about scams turning over a new leaf. The key is how long they can stick to it.
---
The InfoFi track is indeed wild, but can it really succeed relying on rebates? I'm a bit worried about you.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 10h ago
Doing things low-key is indeed more reliable than shouting loudly. All this nonsense is better left to the data to speak for itself.
Three months ago, I already shifted my strategy, and recently I finally made up my mind to abandon the previous approach. To be honest, the previous verbal promotion did attract attention, but the problem is—even if the information shared is truly useful, people are easily distracted by appearances and miss the real value.
Instead of constantly worrying, it's better to focus on the quality of the project itself. Good projects will speak for themselves; whether they are overly packaged or not, there will always be people interested. My personal business mainly focuses on exchange rebate programs. I originally planned to operate discreetly, but unexpectedly, I stepped into the InfoFi track.
The change in content strategy has made me realize one thing: true value is not about how much you say, but what you say. Thanks to this period of reflection, and thank you all for your companionship. Moving forward, I will continue to do what I should.