There's something I want to discuss—this project claims to burn all 8 hundred million tokens. It sounds very heroic, but I just want to ask one question: is this operation really reasonable?
Currently, most people are speculating about the true intention behind this. My view is that if the project team really does this, there are probably two scenarios: one is that they have a clear long-term strategic plan to adjust the token economic model through burning; the other is more subtle—probably less than 1% chance—they haven't thought it through that much. 😂
Honestly, burning 8 hundred million tokens is no small feat, and it will directly impact the overall token circulation and scarcity. The key is whether the subsequent market performance will validate this decision. Without obvious improvements in on-chain data and trading volume, a simple burn might just be a gimmick. However, if this is part of a major update or ecosystem expansion, then it's a different story.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenToaster
· 7h ago
Burning 800 million tokens? Sounds like performance art. The real question is what will happen next.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 8h ago
Burning 800 million tokens? Sounds like a smoke screen before harvesting profits. Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 8h ago
Burning 800 million tokens? I think it's just a smoke screen for positive expectations.
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMiner
· 8h ago
Burning 800 million tokens? It depends on whether there are real positive developments afterward; otherwise, it's just a prelude to harvesting retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 8h ago
Burning 8 billion? It's good to call it a strategy, but it's also the prelude to cutting leeks.
Watching this kind of burn every day, yet the coin price still drops, it's really ironic.
Burns without ecological support are all empty; just wait for zero.
I've seen this routine before: burn to create hype, then secretly issue new coins—it's the same old trick.
Wait and see the on-chain data, don't be fooled by marketing.
If there were a long-term plan, they wouldn't be so eager to do a burn show.
Honestly, it's a bit disheartening. Is this just to attract attention, or are they genuinely working?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 8h ago
Burning 800 million tokens? It depends on whether there is genuine ecosystem support behind it; otherwise, it's just a prelude to a money-grabbing scheme.
There's something I want to discuss—this project claims to burn all 8 hundred million tokens. It sounds very heroic, but I just want to ask one question: is this operation really reasonable?
Currently, most people are speculating about the true intention behind this. My view is that if the project team really does this, there are probably two scenarios: one is that they have a clear long-term strategic plan to adjust the token economic model through burning; the other is more subtle—probably less than 1% chance—they haven't thought it through that much. 😂
Honestly, burning 8 hundred million tokens is no small feat, and it will directly impact the overall token circulation and scarcity. The key is whether the subsequent market performance will validate this decision. Without obvious improvements in on-chain data and trading volume, a simple burn might just be a gimmick. However, if this is part of a major update or ecosystem expansion, then it's a different story.