From the perspective of capital utilization, is GUSD's dual yield truly "smarter"?

In traditional investing, idle funds often mean opportunity costs, and in the crypto market, this cost is further amplified. The GUSD dual yield model is precisely a solution to the problem of "funds lying idle."

Simply holding stablecoins avoids price volatility but also loses the value of time. GUSD, through its dual yield mechanism, transforms stablecoins from "passive defense" to "active earning," allowing funds to continuously operate within a low-risk range. For users with larger capital, the long-term differences can be very significant.
More importantly, this model reduces operational complexity. Users do not need to frequently switch DeFi protocols, calculate Gas costs, or bear contract risks to obtain relatively stable returns, making it very friendly to non-professional investors.

Of course, some people question whether the yields are sustainable. From a market perspective, GUSD's dual yield is not about pursuing extreme annualized returns but emphasizing risk-adjusted returns. It is more like a "financial management tool" rather than a speculative product.

If you focus on capital efficiency, risk control, and long-term compound interest, then the logic of GUSD's dual yield makes sense; if you pursue short-term quick profits, it is obviously not suitable for you.#GUSD双重收益