Here's the thing with secondary market sellers—they're capped by their initial inventory. Can't move more than what's already in hand. That means they literally cannot fulfill new market demand coming in, which is precisely the territory Strategy operates in. It's basic supply-side economics, but somehow this distinction still trips people up. Take a moment to break it down from first principles instead of guessing: constrained sellers can only redistribute existing liquidity, they can't generate fresh demand absorption. That's the whole difference.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter420
· 8h ago
In simple terms, the secondary market is a game of existing assets, and this set of Strategies is the real way to generate incremental growth.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 9h ago
Wow, the difference is indeed significant. The secondary market is just about the existing inventory, while Strategy is the one that truly creates demand.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 9h ago
Basically, the people in the secondary market are stuck with their inventory, and Strategy is the one that can truly create new demand, but some people just can't understand that.
Here's the thing with secondary market sellers—they're capped by their initial inventory. Can't move more than what's already in hand. That means they literally cannot fulfill new market demand coming in, which is precisely the territory Strategy operates in. It's basic supply-side economics, but somehow this distinction still trips people up. Take a moment to break it down from first principles instead of guessing: constrained sellers can only redistribute existing liquidity, they can't generate fresh demand absorption. That's the whole difference.