2026-01-16 17:39:20

In certain markets, institutions control up to 20% of residential real estate—a striking concentration. What's even more significant is their structural advantage: tax benefits that individual buyers simply don't get. This regulatory asymmetry creates an uneven playing field. It's a market distortion that deserves scrutiny, especially when policy makers recognize the fundamental unfairness baked into the system.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 4h ago

According to the database, that 20% of institutional properties should have already been listed in the Guinness World Records. How many years have passed since the last promise of fair competition? Let's wait patiently for the policy to blossom.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 4h ago

This is capitalism. 20% is still considered low. If you ask me, institutions should have been restricted from purchasing long ago.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 4h ago

yo so institutions hoarding 20% of housing while getting tax breaks individuals can't access? analyzed thoroughly and red flags detected all over this setup ngl. that's literally the exploit vector right there—regulatory asymmetry working as intended, not a bug. needs immediate attention fr

Reply0